Help navigation
News
-
RELATED STORIES
-
OFT clears OUP-Nelson Thornes acquisition
The Office of Fair Trading ...
-
Blackwell’s plans expansion this year
Blackwell’s plans to ...
-
Independents flock to NBT’s e-book shop
More than 130 independent b...
-
Kindle Fire extends to 170 countries
Amazon has announced it wil...
-
Pearson makes "significant changes" to structure
Pearson has revealed &ldquo...
Trade responds to Apple launch
01.01.70 | Benedicte Page
Industry figures have given a mixed response to the launch of Apple’s self-publishing and textbook apps, as it emerged that authors will only be able to sell their iBooks through Apple’s iBookstore.
At a New York press conference yesterday (19th January), Apple unveiled iBooks Author, which simplifies the way authors can create their own e-books, at the same time as announcing an iBooks 2 app, with a new ‘textbook’ category to facilitate interactive textbooks.
But on its website, Apple tell authors: “Books created with iBooks Author may not be sold as part of a subscription-based product or service. iBooks Author books must be distributed free of charge or made available for sale via the iBookstore.”
Apple revealed that it has partnered with publishers Pearson, McGraw-Hill and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and will sell high school textbooks for $14,99 or less. Agent Peter Cox has questioned whether the $14.99 or less textbook price could create “a new race to the bottom” in the school textbook market. He said: “I think it is Apple's landgrab. They are trying to be the hardware right at the heart of the education market… This will have wider implications for the burgeoning self-publishing market - not just in textbooks."
Speaking on Radio Litopia in the wake of the announcement, Alison Jones, director of digital development at Palgrave Macmillan, said: “Call me cynical if you will, but surely the announcement was about taking up the iPad by the educational sector more than anything else. They [Apple] have set the price that way because this is all about the hardware rather than the software.” Martyn Daniels, publishing industry consultant and blogger for the Booksellers’ Association, questioned how much money authors and publishers would get after Apple had taken a cut and VAT had been deducted. “If you read the competition agreements, they are very restrictive and they would not necessarily agree with everyone,” he said.
But DK deputy c.e.o. John Duhigg said the new Apple technology represented "a giant leap for how illustrated books will work in the digital world", with the new iBooks offering a "thoroughly immersive" experience which will "encourage all those with a natural curiosity to get excited about the world about them in a bold new way." It was "our book content on steroids," he added.
Dorling Kindersley is publishing four titles through the new iBooks technology in both the UK and US: My First ABC (£1.49), Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Life (£7.49), DK Natural History: Mammals, and DK Natural History: Carnivores/Insects (each £2.49). US prices range from $5 to $15.
DK titles currently on offer are backlist titles, and Duhigg said: "One thing to make clear is that what we've tried to do is to create the best products we can for this platform, so these are not an exact copy of any [print] book. We've been free to set our own prices and we've had to look at our experience in the app space and in the physical book space and come up with products and price points we think should be married to each other."
Steve Smith, president and c.e.o. of John Wiley, said he welcomed the new Apple apps as “a flexible and easy-to-use digital platform to deliver our content and learning assets to students and instructors, and thereby take out some of the inefficiencies of the print model and offer greater value to our customers.”



Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
Another example of Apple iHandcuffs again.
We, in textbook publishing, would be interested in hearing Pearson Education and McGraw Hill's reasoning for doing this. Obviously it makes sense in terms of functionality, accessibility and a major move in the right direction for educational resource; but the price point in particular is an enormous game-changer. Personally it seems like they just took a shot to the foot, a la the iTunes-music industry history.
As a publisher about to launch a book through the iBookstore for the iPad, through Amazon for the Kindle, and Kobo, I was tempted to use the new iBooks Author app to format it for the iBookstore... until, that is, I saw the stipulation that books created using that app can only be sold through the iBookstore.
That is a dramatically different proposition to creating the usual ePub version and uploading it to the iBookstore, then creating slightly differently-formatted versions for the other two outlets.
Is there a single publisher or author on the planet who would wish to use this free software and thereby deprive himself of the chance to sell his book on Amazon and Kobo as well?
I feel a new book coming on... about restrictive practices. And another... about the symbolism of the Apple in literature (ie, The Bible and Sleeping Beauty).
I thought it was interesting - and maybe could promote the generation of something other than text-only ebooks. I have travel books under way, and got quite excited about this.
Until I saw I'd have to upgrade to OS X 10.7 Lion for the app to work. Fail.
But even if Apple gave you a free upgrade and you could use iBooks Author, would you want to restrict yourself to selling only through the iBookstore? I've heard that books on Kindle and Kob sell the odd copy, too.
Is it really that unreasonable that Apple asks you to sell via the Ibookstore only - when it is they that are offering their own proprietary tools for you to enhance your product? For free? Could it be that they are trying to actually compete and differentiate with Amazon & Kobo?
Presumably if Amazon/Kobo offer you a similar suite of tools you can publish with them in a similar way?
Similar to all the academic publishers going through just MUSE or JsTor in the USA, why would you only sell through one route? Would you offer your print books through only one book shop or one book shop chain. No. That would be stupid. Unless you think the world stops at the end of the fifty states or at the end of the Amazon (or Apple in this case).
I don't have a problem with some of these places having a proprietary system so long as we can have versions of our books with all of them, and also in ePub on other websites. I only disagree when any of them demand exclusivity, as Amazon does on its KDP Select programme. They don't let us sell on any other platform if we enroll on that. I would be interested to know how many, and which, other companies demand this. Sometimes people don't realise there are exclusivity clauses until they enroll as they can be tucked away on other webpages.
I dont disagree. But that isn't the point. Except for the version created by Ibooks Author I dont think Apple is stopping you selling your ebook. If you want to also create a pdf/epub/kindle version that you can distribute anywhere then go for your life. You can still do that. You can even produce a print version if you like.
And unbelievably if you don't want to use Ibooks Author then you don't have to.
That's the important thing. No exclusivity condition.
You can't sell what you make in iBooks Author on any other platforms anyway, because it produces .iba files that won't work on anything else.
You'd have to strip out all your multimedia and iBooks-specific formatting, at which point I'd have to ask why you are bothering using Author in the first place, when there are many other tools available to make vanilla EPUBs.
It's a lot of fuss about nothing.
What was the apple in sleeping beauty
Another example of Apple iHandcuffs again.
We, in textbook publishing, would be interested in hearing Pearson Education and McGraw Hill's reasoning for doing this. Obviously it makes sense in terms of functionality, accessibility and a major move in the right direction for educational resource; but the price point in particular is an enormous game-changer. Personally it seems like they just took a shot to the foot, a la the iTunes-music industry history.
As a publisher about to launch a book through the iBookstore for the iPad, through Amazon for the Kindle, and Kobo, I was tempted to use the new iBooks Author app to format it for the iBookstore... until, that is, I saw the stipulation that books created using that app can only be sold through the iBookstore.
That is a dramatically different proposition to creating the usual ePub version and uploading it to the iBookstore, then creating slightly differently-formatted versions for the other two outlets.
Is there a single publisher or author on the planet who would wish to use this free software and thereby deprive himself of the chance to sell his book on Amazon and Kobo as well?
I feel a new book coming on... about restrictive practices. And another... about the symbolism of the Apple in literature (ie, The Bible and Sleeping Beauty).
What was the apple in sleeping beauty
I thought it was interesting - and maybe could promote the generation of something other than text-only ebooks. I have travel books under way, and got quite excited about this.
Until I saw I'd have to upgrade to OS X 10.7 Lion for the app to work. Fail.
But even if Apple gave you a free upgrade and you could use iBooks Author, would you want to restrict yourself to selling only through the iBookstore? I've heard that books on Kindle and Kob sell the odd copy, too.
Is it really that unreasonable that Apple asks you to sell via the Ibookstore only - when it is they that are offering their own proprietary tools for you to enhance your product? For free? Could it be that they are trying to actually compete and differentiate with Amazon & Kobo?
Presumably if Amazon/Kobo offer you a similar suite of tools you can publish with them in a similar way?
You can't sell what you make in iBooks Author on any other platforms anyway, because it produces .iba files that won't work on anything else.
You'd have to strip out all your multimedia and iBooks-specific formatting, at which point I'd have to ask why you are bothering using Author in the first place, when there are many other tools available to make vanilla EPUBs.
It's a lot of fuss about nothing.
Similar to all the academic publishers going through just MUSE or JsTor in the USA, why would you only sell through one route? Would you offer your print books through only one book shop or one book shop chain. No. That would be stupid. Unless you think the world stops at the end of the fifty states or at the end of the Amazon (or Apple in this case).
I dont disagree. But that isn't the point. Except for the version created by Ibooks Author I dont think Apple is stopping you selling your ebook. If you want to also create a pdf/epub/kindle version that you can distribute anywhere then go for your life. You can still do that. You can even produce a print version if you like.
And unbelievably if you don't want to use Ibooks Author then you don't have to.
That's the important thing. No exclusivity condition.
I don't have a problem with some of these places having a proprietary system so long as we can have versions of our books with all of them, and also in ePub on other websites. I only disagree when any of them demand exclusivity, as Amazon does on its KDP Select programme. They don't let us sell on any other platform if we enroll on that. I would be interested to know how many, and which, other companies demand this. Sometimes people don't realise there are exclusivity clauses until they enroll as they can be tucked away on other webpages.