News

SCL discusses 'purpose and proposed way forward'

The Society of Chief Librarians (SCL) is to review its purpose and how it works, as it seeks to be more open with library staff and campaigners.

It has released the minutes of its executive committee meeting online, revealing a plan to identify SCL’s “core purpose and proposed way forward”.

At the meeting on 23rd January, the group considered: “Who do SCL wish to influence? Does SCL have a delivery role? Will SCL have an active participative role?” They also asked: “What is the role of SCL in the future given the reduction in the support that can be expected from Arts Council England (ACE)?” They resolved to form a work plan and discuss the issue further at future meetings.

Nicky Morgan, libraries director at ACE, was also present at the meeting to discuss the findings of its forthcoming research programme, Envisioning the Library of the Future.
The emerging findings have focused on five themes: the importance of physical and virtual library space; the value of libraries to children; libraries as a trusted gateway to knowledge free from commercial interest; the role libraries play in social opportunity and equality; and the tensions between retaining traditional services while also being early adopters of new technology.

From this, ACE has identified four areas to prioritise: the library space; digital technologies; sustainable business models; and leadership and skills. ACE will hold a series of roundtable events this month to test their findings further, with a full report published in March.

Morgan also explained some of the changes in ACE. The new national lead for libraries, who has yet to be appointed, will split their time between equally between libraries and their regional responsibilities. They will be supported by five library relationship managers.

Library campaigner Desmond Clarke said: “It’s good that SCL are making these available, and promising to look at their purpose and how they fit in. They have to ask what their role is, which is something they’ve been unable to answer.”
 

Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"

According to their site: "The Society of Chief Librarians leads the debate on the future of public libraries and advocates for continuous improvement of the public library service on behalf of local people."
If they are acting on behalf of local people then they need to ask the people what their views are. They cannot hold positions on critical and contentious issues that affect libraries without some sort of mandate, democratic accountability or evidence base as they do with their volunteers policy for example. I do hope that their soul searching is the first step in their realisation that they are not cheer leaders for the latest political folly from Westminster but to actually push the case for library users who don't want to replace low paid library managers and assistants and provide a statutory service to themselves. I do think, that the "offers" work that have done is a good thing and I will be pushing my local authority hard to make sure they try and provide as much of the stuff in their as possible.

.
Trevor Craig says, above :

"I do hope that their soul searching is the first step in their realisation that they are not cheer leaders for the latest political folly from Westminster but to actually push the case for library users who don't want to replace low paid library managers and assistants and provide a statutory service to themselves."

and it is so to the point, I had to reiterate it.

Please will the SCL get on apace with their soul searching. Many have not shown that their interest goes beyond ensuring that their own inflated salaries are maintained whilst libraries services are closed, de-staffed, opening-hours cut, book funds reduced, mobiles taken out of service, etc etc.

I challenge any one Chief Librarian in England to propose in a local Budget that he or she would take a 25% cut in salary - in order to retain essential Library staff. It is a gesture that would be good for the SCL's *soul*, at least. Think about it!

According to their site: "The Society of Chief Librarians leads the debate on the future of public libraries and advocates for continuous improvement of the public library service on behalf of local people."
If they are acting on behalf of local people then they need to ask the people what their views are. They cannot hold positions on critical and contentious issues that affect libraries without some sort of mandate, democratic accountability or evidence base as they do with their volunteers policy for example. I do hope that their soul searching is the first step in their realisation that they are not cheer leaders for the latest political folly from Westminster but to actually push the case for library users who don't want to replace low paid library managers and assistants and provide a statutory service to themselves. I do think, that the "offers" work that have done is a good thing and I will be pushing my local authority hard to make sure they try and provide as much of the stuff in their as possible.

.
Trevor Craig says, above :

"I do hope that their soul searching is the first step in their realisation that they are not cheer leaders for the latest political folly from Westminster but to actually push the case for library users who don't want to replace low paid library managers and assistants and provide a statutory service to themselves."

and it is so to the point, I had to reiterate it.

Please will the SCL get on apace with their soul searching. Many have not shown that their interest goes beyond ensuring that their own inflated salaries are maintained whilst libraries services are closed, de-staffed, opening-hours cut, book funds reduced, mobiles taken out of service, etc etc.

I challenge any one Chief Librarian in England to propose in a local Budget that he or she would take a 25% cut in salary - in order to retain essential Library staff. It is a gesture that would be good for the SCL's *soul*, at least. Think about it!