Help navigation
News
-
RELATED STORIES
-
Fourth AIBA honour for Allen & Unwin
Australian publisher Allen ...
-
In depth: BEA 2013
What change a year can brin...
-
In depth: bookselling worldwide
The internet has replaced c...
-
Godfray renews government plea on Amazon
Bookseller Association c.e....
-
Denmark's Kofod sells publishing house
Danish publisher Lindhardt ...
Readers Digest UK could be cut adrift by parent
02.02.10 | Victoria Gallagher
Readers Digest UK could go into administration unless its pension deficit problem is resolved, its parent company has confirmed.
The UK company has become embroiled in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of its parent company after a deal to rescue the US entity was frowned on by the UK Pensions Regulator. Reader's Digest UK has previously said it was unaffected by its parent's problems and had "ample liquidity" and a "very healthy" balance sheet.
A statement released by Readers Digest Association (RDA) said it had, "elected to delay temporarily its emergence from Chapter 11 [bankruptcy proceedings] to address an issue involving the pension scheme".
The UK business has a "longstanding and significant" unfunded liability with its pension scheme. RDA had previously come to an agreement with the trustees of the pension scheme and the Pension Protection Fund to resolve the deficit issue. This agreement was part of the process by which RDA was expected to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in the US. It was also dependent on approval from the Pensions Regulator.
However, on 28th January, the Pensions Regulator indicated that it, "was minded not to" approve the company's clearance application.
The company has now filed a Motion in the US Court which notes that unless this issue is resolved, "it will no longer be able to support the UK business indefinitely and therefore, the UK business may need to file for administration."
The lastest accounts for the company were made up to 30th June 2007, which stated that the company had made a profit before tax of almost £6.8 million, down by more than £1.7m.


Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
This is a case of two very bad alternatives for the Pensions Regulator. If they sign off, they are giving foreign parent companies carte blanche to renege on UK pension commitments, and lots of them will. If they don't sign off, they will probably trigger a domino insolvency effect among close-to-the-edge companies with enormous pension deficits. Nasty for them. Nastier for the RD employees, though. My sympathies, really.
This is a case of two very bad alternatives for the Pensions Regulator. If they sign off, they are giving foreign parent companies carte blanche to renege on UK pension commitments, and lots of them will. If they don't sign off, they will probably trigger a domino insolvency effect among close-to-the-edge companies with enormous pension deficits. Nasty for them. Nastier for the RD employees, though. My sympathies, really.