Help navigation
News
-
RELATED STORIES
-
Hachette US posts free chapters on Facebook
Hachette Book Group in the ...
-
Collins & Brown snips up Mollie Makes books
Collins & Brown has acq...
-
More Meerkat for Ebury
Ebury deputy publisher Andr...
-
Zimbabwe debut to Chatto
Chatto & Windus has won...
-
Frontlist revival for Boyars
Independent Marion Boyars i...
Nineteen libraries now under threat in Surrey
07.09.11 | Bookseller Staff
Surrey council now plans to hand 19 libraries over to community management, or close them, according to local news site Your Local Guardian.
The council's plans, which add eight libraries to the 11 already threatened with closure, have been published as part of a "progress update" for a review due to be discussed on 27th September. If volunteers do not come forward to run the libraries, including 50-year-old Hersham Library, they will be at risk of closure, the site reports.
Opposition Liberal Democrat councillor John Orrick said: "Surrey Conservatives have finally come clean about their plans to force even more local communities to take over the council's responsibilities. These local communities have a gun against their head, either take over running the library or Conservative SCC will close it."
Susan Mealor, secretary of Friends of Hersham Library, said no members had as yet stepped forward to run the library and that it would be a "disaster" were it to close.



Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
READ THIS FOLKS....
Public libraries are protected by law
walkyouhome1 | 16/08/2011 at 2:24 pm | Tags: cuts, law, public libraries and museums act 1964 | Categories: Update | URL: http://wp.me/pZDQu-gi
Originally posted on the Voices for the Library blog.
This letter is reproduced with permission from Mr. Francis Bennion, a retired barrister and active writer and academic, who drafted the Bill which later became the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964, the law which makes public libraries a statutory service. It is in response to the article written by Caitlin Moran, which is reproduced with her permission here.
I read Caitlin Moran’s account of the debt she owes her threatened public library as the only alma mater she has ever had (The Times Magazine, 13 August 2011) with particular sympathy. Nearly half a century ago I was struggling to draft appropriately the Bill that became the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964. I was instructed to draw a reasonable line between the requirements of the public and the limited resources of local authorities. The Act is still operative. Various attempts to enforce it by judicial review are pending.
The Act says a local authority which is a library authority must “provide a comprehensive and efficient library service for all persons . . . whose residence or place of work is within the library area of the authority or who are undergoing full-time education within that area”. Its stock of “books and other printed matter, and pictures, gramophone records, films and other materials”, must be “sufficient in number, range and quality to meet the general requirements and any special requirements both of adults and children”.
[Under this provision a severe reduction now in the public library facilities which were being provided by a particular library authority two or three years ago is likely to be unlawful. This is because there is a presumption that the earlier provision did not exceed what was required under the Act.]
The Act also says that the Government must “superintend, and promote the improvement of, the public library service provided by local authorities in England and Wales, and . . . secure the proper discharge by local authorities of the functions in relation to libraries conferred on them as library authorities”.
It does not appear that the statutory duties I have mentioned are being adequately fulfilled at present. The Act does not contain any provision for reduction of the duties because of a need for “cuts”.[1]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Published in The Times 16 August 2011. The important passage in square brackets was omitted.
Add a comment to this post
WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3836 - Release Date: 08/15/11 19:34:00
Post new comment