Help navigation
News
-
RELATED STORIES
-
New role for Rausing in Granta restructure
Granta proprietor and publi...
-
Philip Gwyn Jones leaves Granta
Philip Gwyn Jones, executiv...
-
Macmillan Education in ELT partnership with Knewton
Macmillan Education has ann...
-
Bookouture signs French-set debut
Digital imprint Bookouture ...
-
Digital leap at Bloomsbury
Bloomsbury has reported an ...
Get author consent in writing, publisher agents told
22.09.11 | Benedicte Page
Agents who wish to publish their clients’ work must offer them a detailed explanation of what they will personally gain from the arrangement and obtain their full and written agreement, the president of the Association of Authors Agents has said.
Speaking ahead of the AAA’s quarterly meeting this week, Anthony Goff said: “Certain members of our community came out strongly and said it was illegal for an agent to publish their own clients. The association is very well aware of potential conflicts of interest and while it is definitely not illegal for an agent to publish their own client, there are hazards or risks. We’ve taken steps to find out exactly where they are and to give advice to members who wish to go down this path.”
Goff said agents were duty bound to give their authors “the very best advice” and had a primary duty “to make it absolutely clear to the author what you stand to gain from it as the publisher and exactly what the alternatives are”. Agents must also get “full and written agreement” from authors, he added. “This is the right way to protect the author and to protect yourself from any comeback against the charge that you’ve set up an arrangement from which you are profiting in a way you wouldn’t usually.”
But agent Peter Cox, an outspoken critic of the development, said saying the move was not illegal was “totally irrelevant” as no one has claimed it is illegal. Cox said for an agent to publish their client’s work came under the heading of “self-dealing” in civil law. “The big problem is that when an agent becomes a principal in a transaction, you are no longer an agent,” he said. “You are wearing two hats and how can you advise an author on what is a good deal?”



Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
I'm with Peter Cox on this one. Agents should not be publishers of their authors' work.
It may not be illegal but it is certainly unethical business practice. Who'd have thought there'd be a day when lawyers would be seen as less immoral than agents?
I'm with Peter Cox on this one. Agents should not be publishers of their authors' work.
It may not be illegal but it is certainly unethical business practice. Who'd have thought there'd be a day when lawyers would be seen as less immoral than agents?