Help navigation
News
-
RELATED STORIES
-
HMRC needs to apply rules to Amazon
Keith Smith from Warwick an...
-
Debut historical fiction prize shortlist revealed
A “strong and diverse...
-
Willetts: Publishers add 'genuine value'
Universities minister David...
-
EC urged to act over e-book 'ecosystems'
Booksellers from across Eur...
-
Publishers donate Nook e-books to Get London Reading
Major publishers are donati...
Booksellers roll out New Year sales promotions
03.01.12 | Lisa Campbell
Booksellers are discounting books and e-books by up to 80% in post-Christmas promotions.
Amazon, which began its January Deals early in December, ran a Boxing Day Deals Week which finished on Sunday and is also offering books with large discounts though its Stock Clearance and 12 Days of Kindle promotions.
A collection of five Jo Nesbo books is being sold for £9.99 – a discount of 75% off, through the Stock Clearance promotion for example and the 12 Days of Kindle promotion is selling a range of e-books for 99p.
Waterstone’s is offering customers up to 50% off books in store and online, running promotions reminding customers to "look after the pennies and the pounds will look after themselves".
W H Smith is offering up to 80% off many of its titles. The high street chain bookseller is also offering customers Kobo e-books from 99p, rivalling Amazon’s 12-day Kindle deal.
Play.com is advertising a Winter Sale, selling the likes of Inheritance by Christopher Paolini for £9.39 instead of an r.r.p of £18.99.
Blackwell is offering customers up to 50% discount from frontlist titles, and has promoted from its 100 History Books of the World collection. Euan Hirst, manager of the flagship Blackwell Broad Street branch in Oxford, said sales in his store were up year-on-year and said larger stores like Cambridge and Edinburgh had done well this Christmas.
He said: "We had a strong week in the run up to Christmas and I think the better weather helped our year-on-year sales. I think customers are bored of the straight forward January sales deals and are looking for something more imaginative rather than red sales sign everywhere."



Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
I couldnt thin k of anything imaginative - so have to stick with the red
CLOSING DOWN SALE
at least my prices are now competitive
Oh great - more ridiculous discounts. And the poor bloody independent is left wondering where the publisher discounts come from to allow such offers to customers. 80%!!!!
I have never known an industry like this one which is committing suicide day-by-day. Absolute madness, and publishers get all they deserve. They can't see the light at the end of the tunnel.
Such a shame because bookshops are an important part of any retail mix, in my view. But not to HarperCollins, Random House, Penguin and so on. Shortsighted and sad. Still, the Chief Execs and the London staff will be made redundant with big pay-offs whilst the bookseller slowly bleeds to death.
Oh, and I would like to contribute on other debates as well, but because I can't afford the subscription, I'm not allowed to. Shame on the Bookseller magazine. There is knowledge out here going to waste, and it could help a bookseller somewhere....
We are doing rather well, thank you.
And no publisher gives discount that allows 80% off. Easy to blame the publishers, nut have a look at your own store. Look hard enough and you'll find the reason it s closing
Typical smug Publisher comment
Old Bookseller - some publishers do extend big discounts, but only the big houses, and usually not enough to allow an 80% discount. However, they do pay the likes of WH Smith a small fortune in "marketing funds" to have their titles on display prominently throughout Christmas, and then when the books invariably don't sell as well as expected, WHS will come back and ask you for even more discount to put them in the Jan sale. It has been this way for some time.
I work for a small to mudium sized publisher and we simply cannot extend massive discounts or pay extortionate ratecard to anyone and the difference between the discount we offer the big retailers and many of our independent booksellers we work with is not that large, and we are doing pretty well.
If any publisher just blames the indies themselves for their demise, then they clearly don't understand the market dynamics at work. Similarly, any bookseller that puts the blame for the current situation at the door of the publishers is quite frankly deluded.
Corey T , Please help me out of my deluded state. Of course I blame publishers for the difficult situation independents find themsleves in. It's the publishers who give ridiculous discounts to the chains who in turn can sell books at 50% off the RRP. I cannot compete with them. Why isn't there a level playing field?
Corey T, sorry, but the demise of the high street bookseller is down largely to publishers giving a seller with much lower overhead a massive starting margin, funded by NOT giving it to the traditional bookseller. So much so that many booksellers source their stock from the likes of Amazon and The Book People. A more level playing field would result in more profit for everyone. But publishers are too blinkered to see it.
When are publishers going to realise that they own the rights, and can allow as much or as little discount as they want?? Trouble is, the die is cast, and if Amazon say no to a title (as if!!!) then the print run is curtailed.
And to dress up discount as 'marketing funds' is disingenuous to say the least. It's gone on for years. Still, the day is approaching when authors and agents will bypass publishers altogether. Then we'll hear some weeping and wailing, but it will all be too late. The trade is doomed.
The reasons are perhaps understandable but Publishers' Sales Directors
have been big on selling but small on strategic thinking . They will sell their books to the supermarkets encouraging aggressive discounting with little regard for the medium term implications for traditional retail .
The BA could have done generic campaigning to educate publishing houses on the implications of favouring product exploiters to the detriment of product stockists and specialists. [Without it being anti competitive incidentally]. Instead as we know they brought them inside the tent of BA membership .
The result is that sales bonuses were paid but the retail trade is effectively dead. It amazed me how they hunted with both "the fox and the hounds ",in seeking to supply to Wholesalers AND their customers as well ? Even today I see blogs where the publisher clearly does not get the strategic inconsistencies of this . IF publishers had withdrawn from the indie sector years ago , given wholesalers the terms that supermarkets enjoyed, then they could have better competed in their support of indies.
Now publishers are having to reconnect directly with the reader in their E book supply bonanza, thus eventually rendering even the chains redundant .
Since the start of time publishers have controlled the market . After all the NBA was a publishers agreement , as is the latest Agency Agreement , which is currently being investigated .
You're referring to the "big" trade publishers, I presume. I can't tell you what they get up to. I can only give you my experience of working for years in small to medium sized non-fiction publishing, where we don't give WH Smith "ratecard" payments to display our books, we don't extend ridiculous discounts to high st chains or Amazon (apart from for remainder stock, which we offer to everyone at the same rate) and regularly offer indies very good deals that we don't offer to anyone else. We have done for years. The playing field is pretty level from us. But yes, of course, this is all our fault.
"Still, the day is approaching when authors and agents will bypass publishers altogether."
Now, I regularly see sentiments like this peddled on here, as if to wag a sanctimonious finger at all publishers and tell us we're all going to get our comeuppance soon.
Is this why publishers, and certainly we are, are still drowning under a deluge of book proposals? This great mass exodus toward self-publishing doesn't seem to be drying up our supply of good, quality content.
I'm sure there are "authors" (and there will be so many more "authors" out there now) who will prefer to take their book to market themselves in thia brave new world, but the vast majority seem to be sticking with us for now, you'll no doubt be sorry to hear.
Yes Corey T I think my comments refer principally to the larger houses . As regards your deluge of publishing proposals. I think that will be slow to change I am pleased to say, but watch the impact of Amazon's publishing and vertical trading as well as an explosion of author to market facilitators .This just takes the publishing model back to where it started with the original presses incidentally.
RRP is a joke. Jamie Olivers book @ £30 when the ASP was £10.72. Maybe there should be a 2nd level of pricing that all trade suppliers/retailers get their discount calculated on. So Amazon, Sainsburys etc can carry on conning their customers into thinking they are getting 65% discount and B&M bookshops can compete on the bigger titles. I hearby propose this new RRP to be the P ublisher A djusted R etail P rice. :-p
@ Nerd - the solution is simple. Get the printed price off books. 'Discount' as a concept thus goes out of the window.
I really do think it is time to get the printed price taken off of books.
I've been arguing for a while that us publishers fix a set cost price for each book - a price that covers all royalties and necessary costs and builds in whatever margin we need to make from each title. We charge all retailers exactly that. We still set an RRP but crucially we are not working from a "discount off RRP" model when selling to our customers. This really is as level a playing field as you could get. This is how it's done in other industries, but for some reason nobody seems that open to it in publishing.
I didn't really think it practical to take prices off books based on the need to sticker everything that came in through goods in,[and to select the margin in every case?]particularly if that is a very busy operation.
I then came up with a cunning scheme for the wholesaler to have each indie customers' mark up plan in our system [ just like the supply discount matrix] eg for pb , HB fiction etc built into the computer and to automatically produce stickers with prices on a sheet or for a charge stuck on for you before we shipped.
This would be done at the same time as running the invoice . In this way you could even mark selected books above RRP as well as mark down.
Clearly as these are just low tack stickers ,you could easily remove and re sticker individual titles yourselves for whatever reason .
Then I retired . Just as well Bertrams IT dept are thinking .
I didn't really think it practical to take prices off books based on the need to sticker everything that came in through goods in,[and to select the margin in every case?]particularly if that is a very busy operation.
I then came up with a cunning scheme for the wholesaler to have each indie customers' mark up plan in our system [ just like the supply discount matrix] eg for pb , HB fiction etc built into the computer and to automatically produce stickers with prices on a sheet or for a charge stuck on for you before we shipped.
This would be done at the same time as running the invoice . In this way you could even mark selected books above RRP as well as mark down.
Clearly as these are just low tack stickers ,you could easily remove and re sticker individual titles yourselves for whatever reason .
Then I retired . Just as well Bertrams IT dept are thinking .
@ Corey T.
he has it in a nut shell, publishers should have a cost price of their "product", including royalties print etc, add in fixed cost price per item (obviously this is a figure slightly made up- but could be calculated) then add a profit margin - hey presto you have a PRICE you wish to achieve. !!!
removing RRP will only alter the % discount - not the price to pay..... as Amazon / supermarkets etc. would still pay the publisher only £7 or £8 for the 30 quid Jamie Oliver book, and so would still sell for £9/£10. while the indie would still only be able to negotiate a price of £16 / £18 and so still needs to sell for £ lots more to make a margin, as relative fixed costs per item are far more per copy sold.
so customers can still scan a barcode on their phone see the price on amazon and say mmmm no ta.
Cost price + fixed costs + margin wanted = price customer to pay.
and our local WHSmiths sells most non-rrp stock (especially maps) at £1 above RRP. clawing money back for the %off, as the customers perceive them to be cheaper places they dont actually check if they ARE or not.
Possibly, but we are doing rather well..
The sad truth is the Market has moved on, people buy books in different ways. This means stores will close.
One branch of waterstones can sell more copies of one of our titles than the entire Indy network of stores, amazon can make or break a book. If an Indy doesn't take it.... Meh, who cares?
You need to look forward rather than hoping things will go back to they way they were. Ain't gonna happen, live with it..
I couldnt thin k of anything imaginative - so have to stick with the red
CLOSING DOWN SALE
at least my prices are now competitive
Oh great - more ridiculous discounts. And the poor bloody independent is left wondering where the publisher discounts come from to allow such offers to customers. 80%!!!!
I have never known an industry like this one which is committing suicide day-by-day. Absolute madness, and publishers get all they deserve. They can't see the light at the end of the tunnel.
Such a shame because bookshops are an important part of any retail mix, in my view. But not to HarperCollins, Random House, Penguin and so on. Shortsighted and sad. Still, the Chief Execs and the London staff will be made redundant with big pay-offs whilst the bookseller slowly bleeds to death.
Oh, and I would like to contribute on other debates as well, but because I can't afford the subscription, I'm not allowed to. Shame on the Bookseller magazine. There is knowledge out here going to waste, and it could help a bookseller somewhere....
Hear! Hear!
We are doing rather well, thank you.
And no publisher gives discount that allows 80% off. Easy to blame the publishers, nut have a look at your own store. Look hard enough and you'll find the reason it s closing
Typical smug Publisher comment
Possibly, but we are doing rather well..
The sad truth is the Market has moved on, people buy books in different ways. This means stores will close.
One branch of waterstones can sell more copies of one of our titles than the entire Indy network of stores, amazon can make or break a book. If an Indy doesn't take it.... Meh, who cares?
You need to look forward rather than hoping things will go back to they way they were. Ain't gonna happen, live with it..
Who is 'A Publisher'. It would be good to know so that we could take an informed decision about whether to stock its books in our stores. With the exception of a few 'must have' fiction authors, there are so many good books around that we don't have to lend our shelves to crass publishers like this. Who are you 'publisher'?
All that would mean is my titles wouldn't be in your closing down sale. I could live with that.
You are clearly a thoroughly nasty piece of work who deserves to be trampled on by the likes of Amazon who you are so clearly in love with. If they decided not to stock 2 of the 5 books you publish you'd be dead in the water.
Take a deep breath, realise you are a better person, know that "A publisher" is trolling and almost certainly not a publisher, release the breath and concearn yourself with more important things.
I'm rather afraid I am. And a commercially focussed one at that
I don't think A Publisher is really a publisher. I think it's a flamer trying to raise the temperature here and bring out some lively argument. The publishers selling in supermarkets expect an even higher volume of sales than A Publisher quotes, and would be using this forum in a different way, if they were using it at all.
I don't believe I quoted any sales volume figure...... Please do correct me if I am wrong.
Supermarkets take many of our titles.
I can't find it any more so perhaps it was on another thread. It was a joke about a number being the quantity of sales over a short period rather than a longer period. We do get contacted by authors who have been with one of the main publishers who sell to supermarkets and who have lost their contract due to not selling in high enough quantities, although they sell very well, so I have an idea of the volume needed. Although they sell well we can't take them - sales aren't everything. They tend to write novels where even the darkest bits have to have a rosy glow and that's not our thing. Another one of our authors turned down one of the supermarket publishers as she didn't want her writing changed into 'blockbuster' style. High volume sales aren't everything for everybody, although I can understand it if it's your main focus as a publisher.
Old Bookseller - some publishers do extend big discounts, but only the big houses, and usually not enough to allow an 80% discount. However, they do pay the likes of WH Smith a small fortune in "marketing funds" to have their titles on display prominently throughout Christmas, and then when the books invariably don't sell as well as expected, WHS will come back and ask you for even more discount to put them in the Jan sale. It has been this way for some time.
I work for a small to mudium sized publisher and we simply cannot extend massive discounts or pay extortionate ratecard to anyone and the difference between the discount we offer the big retailers and many of our independent booksellers we work with is not that large, and we are doing pretty well.
If any publisher just blames the indies themselves for their demise, then they clearly don't understand the market dynamics at work. Similarly, any bookseller that puts the blame for the current situation at the door of the publishers is quite frankly deluded.
Corey T , Please help me out of my deluded state. Of course I blame publishers for the difficult situation independents find themsleves in. It's the publishers who give ridiculous discounts to the chains who in turn can sell books at 50% off the RRP. I cannot compete with them. Why isn't there a level playing field?
Corey T, sorry, but the demise of the high street bookseller is down largely to publishers giving a seller with much lower overhead a massive starting margin, funded by NOT giving it to the traditional bookseller. So much so that many booksellers source their stock from the likes of Amazon and The Book People. A more level playing field would result in more profit for everyone. But publishers are too blinkered to see it.
When are publishers going to realise that they own the rights, and can allow as much or as little discount as they want?? Trouble is, the die is cast, and if Amazon say no to a title (as if!!!) then the print run is curtailed.
And to dress up discount as 'marketing funds' is disingenuous to say the least. It's gone on for years. Still, the day is approaching when authors and agents will bypass publishers altogether. Then we'll hear some weeping and wailing, but it will all be too late. The trade is doomed.
The reasons are perhaps understandable but Publishers' Sales Directors
have been big on selling but small on strategic thinking . They will sell their books to the supermarkets encouraging aggressive discounting with little regard for the medium term implications for traditional retail .
The BA could have done generic campaigning to educate publishing houses on the implications of favouring product exploiters to the detriment of product stockists and specialists. [Without it being anti competitive incidentally]. Instead as we know they brought them inside the tent of BA membership .
The result is that sales bonuses were paid but the retail trade is effectively dead. It amazed me how they hunted with both "the fox and the hounds ",in seeking to supply to Wholesalers AND their customers as well ? Even today I see blogs where the publisher clearly does not get the strategic inconsistencies of this . IF publishers had withdrawn from the indie sector years ago , given wholesalers the terms that supermarkets enjoyed, then they could have better competed in their support of indies.
Now publishers are having to reconnect directly with the reader in their E book supply bonanza, thus eventually rendering even the chains redundant .
Since the start of time publishers have controlled the market . After all the NBA was a publishers agreement , as is the latest Agency Agreement , which is currently being investigated .
You're referring to the "big" trade publishers, I presume. I can't tell you what they get up to. I can only give you my experience of working for years in small to medium sized non-fiction publishing, where we don't give WH Smith "ratecard" payments to display our books, we don't extend ridiculous discounts to high st chains or Amazon (apart from for remainder stock, which we offer to everyone at the same rate) and regularly offer indies very good deals that we don't offer to anyone else. We have done for years. The playing field is pretty level from us. But yes, of course, this is all our fault.
"Still, the day is approaching when authors and agents will bypass publishers altogether."
Now, I regularly see sentiments like this peddled on here, as if to wag a sanctimonious finger at all publishers and tell us we're all going to get our comeuppance soon.
Is this why publishers, and certainly we are, are still drowning under a deluge of book proposals? This great mass exodus toward self-publishing doesn't seem to be drying up our supply of good, quality content.
I'm sure there are "authors" (and there will be so many more "authors" out there now) who will prefer to take their book to market themselves in thia brave new world, but the vast majority seem to be sticking with us for now, you'll no doubt be sorry to hear.
Yes Corey T I think my comments refer principally to the larger houses . As regards your deluge of publishing proposals. I think that will be slow to change I am pleased to say, but watch the impact of Amazon's publishing and vertical trading as well as an explosion of author to market facilitators .This just takes the publishing model back to where it started with the original presses incidentally.
RRP is a joke. Jamie Olivers book @ £30 when the ASP was £10.72. Maybe there should be a 2nd level of pricing that all trade suppliers/retailers get their discount calculated on. So Amazon, Sainsburys etc can carry on conning their customers into thinking they are getting 65% discount and B&M bookshops can compete on the bigger titles. I hearby propose this new RRP to be the P ublisher A djusted R etail P rice. :-p
@ Nerd - the solution is simple. Get the printed price off books. 'Discount' as a concept thus goes out of the window.
I really do think it is time to get the printed price taken off of books.
I've been arguing for a while that us publishers fix a set cost price for each book - a price that covers all royalties and necessary costs and builds in whatever margin we need to make from each title. We charge all retailers exactly that. We still set an RRP but crucially we are not working from a "discount off RRP" model when selling to our customers. This really is as level a playing field as you could get. This is how it's done in other industries, but for some reason nobody seems that open to it in publishing.
I didn't really think it practical to take prices off books based on the need to sticker everything that came in through goods in,[and to select the margin in every case?]particularly if that is a very busy operation.
I then came up with a cunning scheme for the wholesaler to have each indie customers' mark up plan in our system [ just like the supply discount matrix] eg for pb , HB fiction etc built into the computer and to automatically produce stickers with prices on a sheet or for a charge stuck on for you before we shipped.
This would be done at the same time as running the invoice . In this way you could even mark selected books above RRP as well as mark down.
Clearly as these are just low tack stickers ,you could easily remove and re sticker individual titles yourselves for whatever reason .
Then I retired . Just as well Bertrams IT dept are thinking .
I didn't really think it practical to take prices off books based on the need to sticker everything that came in through goods in,[and to select the margin in every case?]particularly if that is a very busy operation.
I then came up with a cunning scheme for the wholesaler to have each indie customers' mark up plan in our system [ just like the supply discount matrix] eg for pb , HB fiction etc built into the computer and to automatically produce stickers with prices on a sheet or for a charge stuck on for you before we shipped.
This would be done at the same time as running the invoice . In this way you could even mark selected books above RRP as well as mark down.
Clearly as these are just low tack stickers ,you could easily remove and re sticker individual titles yourselves for whatever reason .
Then I retired . Just as well Bertrams IT dept are thinking .
@ Corey T.
he has it in a nut shell, publishers should have a cost price of their "product", including royalties print etc, add in fixed cost price per item (obviously this is a figure slightly made up- but could be calculated) then add a profit margin - hey presto you have a PRICE you wish to achieve. !!!
removing RRP will only alter the % discount - not the price to pay..... as Amazon / supermarkets etc. would still pay the publisher only £7 or £8 for the 30 quid Jamie Oliver book, and so would still sell for £9/£10. while the indie would still only be able to negotiate a price of £16 / £18 and so still needs to sell for £ lots more to make a margin, as relative fixed costs per item are far more per copy sold.
so customers can still scan a barcode on their phone see the price on amazon and say mmmm no ta.
Cost price + fixed costs + margin wanted = price customer to pay.
This is exactly how we run things. We also have a policy of not getting involved in exclusivity deals as we believe this hurts the industry. This does not help our relationship with Indie booksellers, however, as nine times out of ten we find they do not want to take a risk stocking our titles. Thus, unfortunately, we have to stick with Waterstones and Amazon.
and our local WHSmiths sells most non-rrp stock (especially maps) at £1 above RRP. clawing money back for the %off, as the customers perceive them to be cheaper places they dont actually check if they ARE or not.
Amazon and Book Depository often sell books at prices we (publishers) couldn't afford to sell them for direct. So they must run at a loss on some books. It's not always the case that publishers give discounts - we don't. Our books are still sold dirt cheap by some online booksellers and with free international postage too.
We can't compete with the discounts Amazon are giving on ebooks either. I'm not sure how we're supposed to sell our Kindle books with the massive discounts they're giving on their selected range of bargain books.
I'm saddened by what's happening to bookshops, but they never stocked the kind of books I wanted to read so online sellers did come as a godsend to me. Finally I could buy poetry, short stories and literary fiction apart from the bestsellers. If everybody is competing to sell the bestsellers at the most attractive price then Amazon will win. Surely independent bookshops need to stock the kind of book Amazon doesn't reliably supply. They're very unreliable with books that don't sell in huge quantities. They just don't stock or supply them although they display them.
Under the terms of our contract we pay authors 10% of the cover price in royalties, so the cover price is important. We also only sell at one rate through our distributor Central Books. So the rate is fixed to as Corey suggested. But the online sellers still sell the books at a huge discount. The prices are actually less than they buy the books for from our distributor. It's a strange business.
The prices are designed to force the high street out of business and is anti-competitive. Once the High Street has gone prices will rise - by a lot for the non-bestseller - and there will be wailing in the press about the good old days of bookshops. The only possible way to address this is to reduce the discount given to online booksellers. But publishers don't have the guts or the nous.
I think the elephant in the room in this debate is Amazon Marketplace. The reason why Amazon can afford to sell so many new books at a loss is because they are raking in fees from Marketplace sellers for doing absolutely nothing other than providing an online shop window. This is the real anti-competitive element of their site. They are able to corner the market in new books (and CDs and DVDs and just about anything else) by offering artificially low prices while at the same time taking a massive cut from all the Marketplace sellers who would once have been their competitors. It's a brilliant strategy and it works like a dream for Amazon and their customers - for now. But who knows where this elephant is leading us all...?
Isn't predatory pricing anti-competitive and against the law? Is consistently selling below cost considered predatory?
It seems to me bookshops want to blame the publishers, but it makes no difference if we don't give a discount. The online sellers discount the books anyway. I see them selling our books for £3. We don't discount any of our books so they are selling them at a loss.
But the fact is that Amazon don't supply many or most of the books they display. When I let all of our following know this they buy elsewhere and this is the message that needs to get out. Look at all of our books on Amazon, and look at the books by similar literary publishers. They are all displayed but with the message 'Out of Stock' or 'Unavailable'.
The worst thing about this is that they still take orders for the books saying they will get them when they're back in stock. None of our books are out of stock. They are all easy for Amazon to supply via Central Books. There are many publishers who have been complaining to Amazon about this for years but it makes no difference.
They take orders for books they have no intention of supplying when those books are easily available via Nielsen and the distributors. You only have to compare what they say about our books on Amazon and on Book Depository. They own Book Depository and yet Book Depository take orders and supply all of our books immediately.
Amazon gives the impression our books are out of print or hard to get, which isn't true. By taking orders and sending emails over a period of weeks telling customers the book isn't in stock yet but they will let them know when it is they lose publishers and authors a high number of sales. I was with a larger literary publisher before starting my own company, and the same thing happened for them.
Customers use Amazon for information on book availability and the message needs to get out that they don't supply many or most of the books they display. When they are seen as this unreliable it will make a difference. It also means there are many books Amazon doesn't supply which bookshops could sell. The reason customers have come into shops, having seen a lower price on Amazon, may well be that Amazon didn't actually supply the book - that's the marketing message bookshops need to put across.
This isn't just my company I'm talking about - I've had this discussion with a number of publishers including some well established literary fiction and poetry publishers. They have tried and tried with Amazon but get nowhere. I know one very powerful woman in publishing tried a strong campaign and got nowhere. The sad thing is that customers still believe the information on Amazon and keep wanting to buy there - they trust Amazon. With more information about what is really happening they wouldn't have this trust and would shop elsewhere.
Instead of blaming publishers for doing nothing, you should realise we have been trying for years but they don't listen. They do lose a massive number of sales by taking orders and not supplying books. The discounted prices aren't as serious a problem as that.
The way they display wrong information and take orders with no intention of supplying the books should be illegal in my opinion.
@ Old Bookseller, I don't think prices will rise even if bookshops go. If they did we would have more chance of selling books direct from our own website, which would really help. But I think online sellers will always have competitive pricing because otherwise somebody else could easily sell for lower. As they have marketplace resellers the competition for pricing is all gathered in one place. It's the resellers who are selling our books for less than cost, although Book Depository offers pre-order prices we can't match when you take into account their free postage.
I'm sad about bookshops but it won't actually have a big impact on non bestsellers because they're so hard to get into many bookshops anyway. It won't affect our pricing on non bestsellers at all. We have always had to find ways to sell them without the support of bookshops.
It's a pity bookshops don't work more with publishers of literary fiction and poetry. All books by publishers like us are supplied by the distributor sale or return, so we do support bookshops in various ways. I drum up a great crowd for events and could fill bookshops with them - I hold readings and open mics with the chance for those who read to submit to an anthology. I offer to hold events at bookshops and fill their store but they want to charge £200-£400, which we can't justify, so I do it in a library and support them.
There are opportunities bookshops could take, I think, and I'd suggest a focus on the books Amazon is unreliable at supplying, plus I have a great belief in events to bring that footfall you want.
I agree with that completely. The bleating about lack of support would be a lot more valid if the average Indy didn't buy the majority of their stock through wholesalers.
Support is a two way street.
They can buy through a wholesaler with us - Central Books. But they don't. I've been pleased to have some support from bookshops, but it's not really the main source of our sales. Without Book Depository it would be much harder for us to keep going. And sales of our Kindles have been quite good over Christmas too. People look on Amazon when they can't find our books in shops and buy from us as we're listed as resellers. We really need these online sellers.
A publisher you are way off line . They need to buy off wholesalers to survive . Do you actually know what wholesalers do for indies?
Yes, I know. Wholesalers, especially Gardners and Berts, are fantastic. Supportive of publishers and stores, I have no row with them.
My point is this, if you buy your stock exclusively through a wholesaler, and don't see the rep, what right do you have to complain about your base level of discount?
The stores that support us get a lot back, in terms of extra margin, signed stock, events, review copies, free copies for their book club etc etc.
Those that don't will never get any of this.
Well yes, we absolutely have to stock our books with a wholesaler. Most bookshops and online sellers will only buy from them. We love it if people buy direct from the website but very few people will so wholesalers are vital.
The wholesaler also supplies the books sale or return to bookshops all over the UK and Ireland, so bookshops are really supported by all of this. We couldn't really manage the workload without them warehousing our books.
We could give independent bookshops a lower rate if we didn't have to go through a wholesaler though, because a commission is taken at each stage. But we have to sign a contract only to use the wholesalers in the UK. We do arrange better discounts for bookshops overseas, while still managing to pay the authors their full 10% of cover price royalties.
I get the feeling the problem with Amazon not supplying many of the books they display could be that they mainly deal through their wholesaler Gardners. Gardners won't work with publishers like us who don't have bestsellers, so it's really hard to get Amazon to actually supply our books when they take orders. The same is true for many excellent presses specialising in literary fiction and poetry.
So I do think wholesalers can be a problem. Some wholesalers are also slow to deliver to bookshops which puts them off stocking the books, but the larger wholesalers won't support literary fiction and poetry presses so it's a vicious circle.
I can understand the frustration of publishers who feel it's a problem that bookshops insist on dealing with a wholesaler. We just have to work with it though, because that's how it is.
Some people think the below cost books displayed by online sellers don't actually exist, and that they're 'loss leaders' attracting people to their sites when they have no intention of supplying the book. Apparently this is illegal and when somebody in a strong enough position challenges it legally hopefully it will stop. It's easy to blame the publishers for discounting, but these low prices seem to me to be due to aggressive marketing strategies by some online sellers. The important way to challenge this is to increase awareness in buyers that these books don't exist and won't be supplied if ordered.
It is clear from Adele's comments that smaller presses can't prevent Amazon from discounting them without their complicity, and neither do they have the money to take them to court over it. Anyway, sadly, Old Bookseller, I doubt it is illegal to sell something at a loss, even if it could be called a predatory strategy. So we need to do as Adele says and start shouting about it. And we need to stand together, not bicker over past mistakes. Booksellers and publishers need each other, and Amazon hurts us all, so stop blaming all publishers for the actions of the big few, and start lobbying everyone who should be standing up for our interests and isn't, such as the BA.
Adele,
As somebody who runs a large and successful fiction section in a large bookstore, I would be very interested to know who you represent and what you would recommend? I am looking to expand my short story and poetry sections and am always keen to support the more specialised and knowledgeable publishers since the majority of my short story fans are literary readers, rather than the blockbuster type.
Do you have a website I could check out (forgive me if you've already mentioned this elsewhere).
Mr D - is there some discreet way you can be contacted? I imagine there would be a lot of people keen to recommend their books to you, and realise that this is not the place for that!
Stay tuned. I will get you some means of contact. As you said, please don't give me a list of authors anyone. This isn't the place. Was simply looking for a contact for Adele, since I have been impressed by her blogging, reasoning and passion on these here pages.
In the meantime. Thanks for the website link Adele. I will discuss it with collegues and hopefully some orders will be in the pipeline (even if it's only for myself).
My contact details are on the website so do email me. Thank you for the support and encouragement. The Andrew Motion/Jo Shapcott anthology is probably worth a shot for most bookshops. I am a bit passionate about books!
Mr D - I co-own Ward Wood Publishing and won't promote our authors here but if you look on the wardwoodpublishing.co.uk website you will see they are award winning. They are also very aware of the need to promote their books and are very active. If you're in London I would also help in other ways, and I would like to take up the challenge thrown down for publishers and booksellers to help each other rather than bickering by saying I do promote any bookshops who stock our books and would like to put a page on our website for that. Thank you for asking!