News

ACE faces further cut to funding

Arts Council England faces a 3% funding cut over the next two years.

Chief executive Alan Davey described the current climate for arts funding as “extremely challenging” and admitted that cuts will have to be passed on directly to arts organisations.

A reduction to the Department for Culture, Sport and Media’s budget, announced in the Autumn Statement, will be passed on to ACE as a cut to their grant in aid of £3.9m, or 1% in 2013-14, and £7.7m, 2%, in 2014-15.

Davey said: “The government’s intention seems to have been that Whitehall departments absorb any cuts themselves from efficiencies but since the DCMS has already given itself a 50% administration cut – which was also applied to the Arts Council and other NDPBs [non-departmental public bodies] – the department’s latest cuts have been passed straight on to the bodies it funds.”

He added: “What is clear is that our grant in aid budgets for National Portfolio Organisations and museum activity will reduce by 1% and 2%. We must now look closely at the figures and decide how we will pass these cuts on. Some organisations are also having to deal with local authority cuts and so the situation is extremely challenging.”

The Reading Agency, BookTrust, Carcanet, Bloodaxe and Arcadia are among ACE's roster of National Portfolio Organisations.

Neil Astley, editor and m.d. of Bloodaxe Books, said: “ACE sent an email to all of their clients saying they may have to pass on their cuts of 1% and 2%. We still don’t know what kind of impact it will have. It has happened to us before a few years ago.. .and we had a 5% cut that they had to pass on. A 1% cut will hopefully not be quite so problematic, but I do worry about what lies ahead. It’s three years until our funding is renewed, and who knows what the DCMS will have asked of ACE by then. “

The news follows previous cutbacks at ACE, which will see them losing a fifth of staff and restructuring their regional offices. The changes will mean they will no longer have a dedicated libraries director, while their regional offices are cut from nine down to five.

The Bookseller has previously reported on how ACE cuts will impact on areas like Newcastle, where the city council has announced plans to scrap its entire budget for culture, and cut down its number of libraries from 18 to just eight.

Claire Malcolm, chief executive of New Writing North which supports literature in the region and is funded by ACE, recently described the cuts to funding as “dark times”.

 

Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"

*This Horse Is Not Fit to Run*

On 5th December, the Minister, Ed Vaizey's, written answer to a parliamentary question included:

"Under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1954 it is the duty of the Secretary of State to superintend and promote the public library service. The Arts Council England (ACE) contributes to this function by acting as a development agency for libraries, a role they have been administering since October 2011. ACE work closely with, and use their investment to support, local authorities to understand a range of approaches to deliver a modern efficient library service which meet the needs of their local communities."

The Bookseller reports here that ACE will "no longer have a dedicated libraries director". Given the very little that ACE has managed to do for public libraries *with* a "libraries director", it seems that *without* one even less can be accomplished.

The Culture Minister would surely have known about this cut to ACE before formulating his answer. Was he not aware at the time that the horse he backs to run on behalf of the public library service was to be shot in the kneecaps within a month?

What will be put in place to carry out the functions he details in his answer, and will it be fit for purpose?

Libraries are cut adrift and the 1964 act is meaningless. 4.5 people working on library policy in the DCMS and nobody left giving the five remaining libraries development managers any full time direction in the Arts council. There is no way Vaizey and Miller are meeting their legal requirements to superintend and promote if they have nobody superintending and nobody promoting..

*This Horse Is Not Fit to Run*

On 5th December, the Minister, Ed Vaizey's, written answer to a parliamentary question included:

"Under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1954 it is the duty of the Secretary of State to superintend and promote the public library service. The Arts Council England (ACE) contributes to this function by acting as a development agency for libraries, a role they have been administering since October 2011. ACE work closely with, and use their investment to support, local authorities to understand a range of approaches to deliver a modern efficient library service which meet the needs of their local communities."

The Bookseller reports here that ACE will "no longer have a dedicated libraries director". Given the very little that ACE has managed to do for public libraries *with* a "libraries director", it seems that *without* one even less can be accomplished.

The Culture Minister would surely have known about this cut to ACE before formulating his answer. Was he not aware at the time that the horse he backs to run on behalf of the public library service was to be shot in the kneecaps within a month?

What will be put in place to carry out the functions he details in his answer, and will it be fit for purpose?

Libraries are cut adrift and the 1964 act is meaningless. 4.5 people working on library policy in the DCMS and nobody left giving the five remaining libraries development managers any full time direction in the Arts council. There is no way Vaizey and Miller are meeting their legal requirements to superintend and promote if they have nobody superintending and nobody promoting..