News
Random US: no regrets over Islam book
12.08.08 Philip Jones
Random House US has said that it has no regrets about pulling out of publication of Sherry Jones' Islam-inspired romantic novel, The Jewel of Medina, despite the growing controversy about the decision. The news, which broke in the US last week, has led to widespread criticism, and drawn comparisons with The Satanic Verses and the Danish Mohammed cartoons row.
But Stuart Applebaum Random House US spokesman told The Bookseller that the publisher had had "no second thoughts". "It was a difficult decision: one that we have seldom had to take before and one that we hope not to have to take again," he said. Applebaum said that the decision had been taken by Gina Centrello, president and publisher of the Random House Publishing Group in the US, after several "credible and unrelated sources" warned that it might be offensive to some in the Muslim community, and could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.
However, the explanation has failed to convince some observers. In a strongly worded piece on the Guardian website, Andrew Franklin, publisher at the UK-based Profile Books, was damning about the decision. "It's absolutely shocking. They are such cowards," he said. When asked about his comments, Franklin told The Bookseller: "I just think publishers should uphold the principle of free speech – editorial judgement is very important, but free speech is sacred, without it we should give up and go home."
In a separate statement, Random House US said: "We stand firmly by our responsibility to support our authors and the free discussion of ideas, even those that may be construed as offensive by some. However, a publisher must weigh that responsibility against others that it also bears, and in this instance we decided, after much deliberation, to postpone publication for the safety of the author, employees of Random House, booksellers and anyone else who would be involved in distribution and sale of the novel."
The Jewel of Medina a debut novel by journalist Sherry Jones, was due to be published today (12th August) by Random House's Ballantine imprint. Jones, who has just completed a sequel to the novel examining her heroine’s later life, is now free to sell her book to other publishers. It did not have a UK publisher. Writing on her author blog, Jones described the past few months as "heartbreaking", but added that novel would find a new English-language publisher. She said the book was not a "bodice-ripper", nor particularly "racy," and claimed that the book and its sequel were intended as "bridge-builders to another culture".
She told the Guardian: "Frankly I'm more afraid of global warming than of terrorist attacks," she said. "I did expect my book would be controversial." She said she hoped the book would find a new publisher to take it one with "eyes wide open".
Comments on this article
By Jonathan Ruppin
So, will Andrew Franklin put his money where his mouth is and consider publishing it in the UK?12 Aug 08 15:47
By Jonas Pell
So now we are letting violent Muslim fanatics dictate our media content? I understand the publishers are trying to make money and not stir up controversy, but this is too craven. Muslim, however, ALMOST NEVER show the same sensitivity to other religions that our craven media mavens do.12 Aug 08 20:09
By Diz Gust
So, Random House has no fears in publishing a fictional Novel, and slandering The Church and several Catholic Organizations like Opus Dei? (Big Brave Random House, taking on the Church, even if the content was totally fraudulent). But some Islamic College Prof issues a threat of physical violence, and Random House caves in. Better get used to Islam controlling our press, if Random House's response is any indication.12 Aug 08 21:18
By Joe Kaffir
If Random House does not stand for free speech, then who does? Have we already become dhimmis to izlam? I would rather the US government completely eradicate izlam from our shores than suffer this insane tyrannical destruction of OUR constitutional rights. Why does the Government not stand up for the constitution?12 Aug 08 22:08
By JULIAN RIVERS
I dont think that Random House would regard themselves as particularly brave in their publishing . Why should they need to be ? I recall that they withdrew from publishing "HOUSE OF BUSH , HOUSE OF SAUD" [Craig Unger] because of Saudi litigation fears . It was left to tiny Gibson Square to publish with considerable success. A brave [and smart] indie will outperform a corporate publisher in this regard every time .13 Aug 08 14:09
By Jonathan Ruppin
Thinking about this further after my first post, I agree entirely with the principle that people's religious beliefs should not dictate which books are published or stocked. In practice, however, the sad fact of the matter is it would take just one fanatic to attack a bookseller and the book would be withdrawn. Booksellers would want to be paid a little more than seven quid an hour to work on the front line in a conflict between religious belief and secularism. So far the worst I've had to deal is the occasional Muslim tearing up copies of The Satanic Verses (and in one enterprising case smearing them with Marmite, which is an extraordinarily effective way of vandalising a book) and a Christian attempting to lay waste to a window of gay fiction, but I'm not putting my life on the line for a novel. This is an issue for society as a whole. Do we want organised religion to have a say in how we live our lives or do we prevent them from imposing their agenda on the rest of us? From radical Islam in the East to fundamentalist Christianity in the West, many major powers are theocratic to some extent, including the United States, where Christian groups dictate much Republican Party policy - as poster 'Joe Kaffir' would do well to note - and have caused books by thoroughly wholesome authors such as Anne Fine and J K Rowling to be withdrawn from school libraries. Those countries which consider themselves democratic need to take a stand against organised religion. All organised religion. And I'd still like to know if Andrew Franklin has requested a copy to read so that he can consider this book for the Profile list.13 Aug 08 15:54
By BW
The reason we see the Danish cartoons creating such a backlash in Europe is that the people complaining know their complaints will be respectfully received. Conversely, we haven’t had such incidents in this country because everyone assumed, apparently erroneously, that the Americans would tell them where to stick it. Not anymore. Once you get one book spiked, you can bet numerous attempts will follow. The fewer the works, the easier it will be to concentrate efforts at keeping them out of print.13 Aug 08 16:28
By ED
Random House has forsaken the ideals of a free society, and instead cower under their desks in New York.A travesty. A sad legacy to add to the likes of Mr.Cerf and Bob Berstein.13 Aug 08 18:14
By Z. Hussain
It is sicking in this day and age when a person has nothing better to do with their boring lives but write to offend others' religions or practises which they have no knowledge of or never have bothered to research; and yet, judge another upon lack of ignorance. She told the Guardian: "Frankly I'm more afraid of global warming than of terrorist attacks," she said. "I did expect my book would be controversial." The book is more than controvesial, its vindictive and insulting to the millions who follow the religion of Islam. Furthermore Ms. Jones has wrote a love story which is controversial in deluding the actual events which occured at the time. The book is a 'gimik' in making monies and claiming world-wide fame upon insultive and soft pornographic material; and historically totally inaccurate. Will Ms. Jones and Mr. Franklin be responsible for the consequences that will enfold if this book is published in the UK. NO! I thought not; they will be sitting on a beach counting their millions on others' misfortune. Britain or the world doesn't need this novel which will ignite elements of terrorism across the globe. There is no harm in writting a story but to falsify historical events or create elements which never took place is insultive to Muslims world-wide whom hold the wives of the Holy Prophet (SAW) in great esteem. I ask Ms. Jones to re-write her novel or edit the falsified story which is deemed offensive to many muslims. Muslims hold and respect every religion in high esteem, Mr. Pell. Let me ask when has a muslim been insultive or has defamed another religion. We are brought up to respect prominent figures of other religions such as Moses, Jesus, Ram and Buddha in great esteem. Prof. Spellberg and Random House have made a gallant, respectable choice in refusing to publish something which is deeemed abusive and disrespectful to the Muslims world-wide. I pose a question does 'freedom of speech give us the right to offend others, who are different from us in what they wear, worship and practise; is the freedom of speech another name or form of discrimination where we stand on pole expressing our right to abuse someone who is different from us' - the answer is no, we have no right to offend others whether it be in spoken or written form.10 Sep 08 11:34
By JULIAN RIVERS
The last item [Z.Hussain] sums up the position . He presumably has read the manuscript of this unpublished work ? He is offended ...by what ? In Britain we celebrate a freedom of expression rare in Islamic countries . We really must defend this with great determination and energy . When I was Marketing Director of Dillons at the time of Satanic Verses the pressure not to stock the book was enormous. But we did . Incidentally the pressure from radical Christians not to stock books on witchcraft and even vegetarians not to stock meat cookery books [ true!] indicates how censorship can soon escalate into farce if we respond to pressure groups as Mr Hussain requires . In Britiain the Lord Chaimberlain is the censor , lets leave it to him not Mr Hussain should we ? I note that brave Gibson Square are to publish this book in October in the U.K. .We should support them because they are making a stand for our freedom , defended throughout history and so easily given away by pseudo censorship as demonstrated by Random House10 Sep 08 12:05
By Z. Hussain
Mr. Rivers, freemdom of expression! Sorry, you mean FREEDOM TO EXERCISE INSULTIVE OR ABUSIVE STATEMENTS IN SPEECH OR WITTEN FORM. For your information, I've read the prologue to the novel which was disgraceful and insulting in the way it characterised Islam's historical figures. But as you stated you need to defend it with great determination and energy; and I, on the other hand, should and will opose it with great determination and energy. We agree to differ.12 Sep 08 05:09
By JULIAN RIVERS
Well Mr Hussain you are free to have your opinion, and to state it .I can tell that you are already very exercised by the forthcoming publication . I am sure that Gibson square [ based on their published comments] are not seeking to do anything more than publish a story which the publisher has had read by a number of muslim readers with "positive comments".Not reflecting your personal views I guess . ?Gibson Square dont have a record of trying to insult anyone as far as I am aware . You, just like everybody else, are free not to buy the book . The difference lies in your wish to prevent others from buying it , and that opens up a can of worms in a free society.12 Sep 08 08:12
By Z. Hussain
You are right, Mr. Rivers. I am entightled to my opinion as you are to yours. But how could you state that there are ' positive comments' from Muslims. How can Muslims accept something that states or deludes that Lady Aishah (RA) was on the verge of committing adultery. Which is absurd, my good man. May I recommend couple of books to you 'Muhammad: Based upon earliest sources by Martin Lings' or 'Muhammad: The Messenger of Islam by Hajjah Amina Adil'. Society is to blame as 'dogs do have habit of barking'...12 Sep 08 14:46
By JULIAN RIVERS
Thanks for your comments .I am just repeating what the publisher has stated on this very site under the heading "Rynja plans Jewel author tour",[10/09/08] where he stated that 4 Muslim readers have been very positive about the book .Not my opinion just a repeat of the published statement on this site . Thanks for your book recommendations .12 Sep 08 15:05
See Also
Related
- Gibson Square buys Jewel of Medina for UK
- UK 'outperforms', as Random sales slip
- Authors Guild warns over S&S e-move
- Random US pulls Islam novel
- Bertelsmann sells US book clubs
Book news from the BBC
- Learning Welsh at home - in Japan
- Ugly tale of triumph over trials
- Businesses suffer as Thais protest
- Britons still stuck in Thai chaos
- Bath return for Chris Patten
Latest Comments
- Hey Jo....I'm beginning to like you...even an 'erotic poet' has a heart (...
- So, what Ray? The Bookseller and all media shouldn't bother reporting about...
- Come on Jo for **** sake! Anyone working in retail must be fully aware of...
- Bet the 30,000 employees are equally bored Ray: we can't all be erotic poets.
- Bored shitless with this.
RSS
Subscriber Content