News

« Headlines

Byng bashes Booker judges

Canongate publisher Jamie Byng has launched an astonishing attack on the Man Booker Prize judges after the title submitted by the publisher--Helen Garner's The Spare Room--failed to make this year's longlist.

Writing in the online forum on the Man Booker Prize's website, Byng stated: "I cannot respect a judging committee that decides to pick a book like Child 44, a fairly well-written and well-paced thriller that is no more than that, over novels as exceptional as Helen Garner's The Spare Room or Ross Raisin's God's Own Country."

Byng wrote, "one has to be philosophical about these things", but added that he was "certain" that The Spare Room was a modern classic that would continue to be "read and enjoyed and appreciated long after all of us are dead".

He told The Bookseller: "One is entitled to care about a book if you are its publisher."

However, Byng praised the inclusion of the Salman Rushdie, Sebastian Barry and Steve Toltz novels.

In other reactions to the longlist, the Guardian's Claire Armitstead said that "overall, we should applaud the Booker's focus on first-time novelists". She assesses: "The negative side of this is that novelty doesn't last, and there's little enthusiasm for nurturing writers through those tricky second and third books. The positive side is that it allows fresh voices to be heard, carrying new worlds and new sensibilities into the traditionally rather parochial world of English language fiction, thereby changing and enriching it."

John Sutherland asks on the Guardian website: "So what's the point of the longlist? . . . In short, the longlist is good for business. It boils the kettle." He misses Adam Mars-Jones's Pilcrow. "Because, I hypothesise, if you do the math - or, to be more precise, the geography - there is only room for, at best, two echt 'English' male novelists," he writes. "Invisibly, slots have been created. And very narrow slots they are."

In the Independent, Boyd Tonkin wonders why James Kelman's Kieron Smith, Boy was left off the list, but mainly praises the titles that made it. "Some less predictable contenders merit a cheer," he adds, and of Child 44, he says: "With his Stalin-era investigator in Child 44, Tom Rob Smith achieves what has so far eluded the Rankins and Jameses: a penultimate-round Booker run for an upscale detective novel."

 

 

Blog: The Booker circus

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By AN Author

pity the Bookseller can't spell the name of the Grauniad's literary editor!

30 Jul 08 10:19

Unsuitable?

By Anna.Richardson@bookseller.co.uk

Duly noted and changed - thanks!

30 Jul 08 10:27

Unsuitable?

By Stewart

It's not really "astonishing", is it? The list reads like they've went in with quotas to observe and picked titles for their diversity rather than their writing. There was better quote from someone on the Booker forum saying, and I paraphrase, that it was a good year for literature but only the Booker judges didn't realise this.

30 Jul 08 11:06

Unsuitable?

By AN Author

I wonder if Byng is just piqued because he's had to face the fact that hype and clever marketing don't always add up to literary success - or even (dare I say it?) quality.

30 Jul 08 11:19

Unsuitable?

By Stewart

AN Author, I would say that it may just confirm hype can work. Child 44 has been hyped all year.

30 Jul 08 11:28

Unsuitable?

By AN Author

no one can teach Canongate lessons about hype! Surely this froth about the Booker just proves what everyone already knows about fiction (and even non-fiction, given the recent SJ prize) - that it's highly subjective. I don't see anything wrong with having a detective novel in the running...

30 Jul 08 11:38

Unsuitable?

By joe

The judges are expressing their opinions. Their opinions are different to Mr Byng's and he's not on the judging panel. In my humble opinion it's an interesting list. But that's just an opinion- it's not right and it's not wrong

30 Jul 08 16:56

Unsuitable?

By David R N Livesley - Woodstock Vermont

Love him or loath him....Jamie at least does come out and express an opinion unlike many of the corporate "don't quote me' suits who are too worried about their pension plans to actually be a teeny bit controversial. The world needs folks with spunk who go against the flow...ok it's a little bit easier if you own the company but he and his staff have produced some creative packages that have stimulated a demand with the punter, and not just bought two foot of space in 'Watersmithders' hoping that the hype might work.

01 Aug 08 22:36

Unsuitable?

See Also