News
'No plans' for Amazon UK p.o.d.
02.04.08 Graeme Neill
Amazon.co.uk has said there are no plans to introduce its controversial print on demand service BookSurge to the United Kingdom. US parent Amazon.com caused a storm last week after it told publishers that all p.o.d. titles would have to be printed at Amazon's own fulfilment centre. It has raised fears that Amazon is trying to squeeze competitors out of the print on demand market.
One observer said that the move could be seen as "the thin end of the wedge". "Will they eventually say to HarperCollins for example 'We don't want your physical books anymore. Instead we will print them at our centres'? If you look at what they have done with eBooks, they are selling them in their own format. Where do you draw the line?"
Angela Hoy, co-owner of print on demand services company BookLocker, who raised the first objections, said: "From the p.o.d. publishers we've talked to, and from our own experience at BookLocker, we could all be looking at a dire and immediate threat of revenue cuts if we refuse to sign the Amazon/BookSurge contract."
PublishAmerica said that it had been told that if it did not comply, the "Buy" button would be removed from all of the publisher's listings. "This demand would force PublishAmerica to submit 60,000 separate book files (text and cover), and redo each of them in order to conform to Amazon's complicated technical specifications."
Amazon.com responded publicly this week, putting an open letter on its website. It said that the move was to ensure that books were able to be sent to customers using services like Amazon Prime, which provides speedier shipping for an annual fee. "Print on demand items printed inside our own fulfilment centers can make our Amazon Prime cutoff times. P.o.d. items printed outside cannot. Simply put, we can provide a better, more timely customer experience if the p.o.d. titles are printed inside our own fulfillment centres. In addition, printing these titles in our own fulfillment centres saves transportation costs and transportation fuel."
It said that publishers who wished to use third party print on demand services could continue to do so. However, they would have to provide at least five copies of the book to Amazon via its Advantage service, which costs publishers $29.95 per year and 55% of the list price of each book sold to join. "That small cache of inventory allows us to provide the same rapid fulfilment capability to our customers that we would have if we were printing the titles ourselves on p.o.d. printing machines located inside our fulfilment centers," it said.
An Amazon.co.uk spokesman said there were "no plans" to introduce the BookSurge service into the UK, but added: "We do not comment on future plans."
Comments on this article
By JULIAN RIVERS
In a world where we are seeking to remove waste from the supply chain , isn't it the perfect solution for Amazon and others to print exactly what they need to supply their customers , on demand ?. We learn that Waterstones are setting up their central distribution operation for "enviromental reasons ", and so a POD operation on site would complete this circle , for them too . Similarly the two national wholesalers need to accelerate their use of POD and the mainstream general publishers to embrace it. Think of the savings in diesel , paper waste and storage . It will take 10 years to complete of course but it will happen, be certain of that , and Amazon seem sure to lead the demand .By Clive Keeble
Julian, yes POD is the way for the future for certain titles ; but, *NO* , not under no circumstances should publishers be forced to have their books printed by Amazon's own BookSurge (rather than Ingram's Lightning Source) if they wish to be sold directly by Amazon. Those UK readers who want to get up to speed on this issue are strongly recommended to read Angela Hoy's WritersWeekly ezine http://www.writersweekly.com/the_latest_from_angelahoycom/004597_03272008.html The webpage updates with relevant correspondence from US publishers as well as Lightning Source. Oh, and Julian if you really want to fight the cause for the environment you would do well to preach the gospel of *firm sale* for all titles - many illustrated titles do not lend themselves to a quality POD.By JULIAN RIVERS
I was not really advocating a particular source for POD , and it will not be practical for Amazon to specify Booksurge in all but pre agreed cases . Lightning Source have been supplying Amazon in the USA since day 1 and in the U.K. since it opened its Milton Keynes facility . It is just a truism that POD at point of sale must be the future for a world where resources are increasingly important.By Clive Keeble
Julian, your's is a nice political response to a commercial situation where a corporation (Amazon) is trying to force their own POD printer (BookSurge) upon publishers. This news report is not about the pros and cons of POD ; rather (with a Jeff Bezos's photo heading the page), it is very much about aggressive Amazon supply terms. Amazon are a retailer, not a wholesaler ; they should not expect the booktrade to turn on a dime to suit their every need. WritersWeekly have created a new webpage to assist readers get up to speed on this issue http://www.writersweekly.com/amazon.phpBy Author
For now, Amazon may be letting the UK off because antitrust laws are tighter there. They may even not pass muster here. Already, at least one state attorney general is looking into this matter. Given that Amazon sells everywhere, any AG in any of our 50 states can take up this matter and get national headlines. Keep in mind that this bullying will not stop with POD publishers. Already, as Writers Weekly has reported that Amazon reps have contacted the University of Pennsylvania Press. To quote someone there: "I work at a medium-sized university press, where most of our titles are conventionally printed via offset. However, Amazon called our director about two weeks ago, telling him that soon we would be required to use Booksurge." I don't know what it is about the business climate in Seattle, but a pattern is beginning to develop. First Microsoft in the 1990s and a brutal antitrust lawsuit that the firm tried to lie their way out of. Then Boeing tried to bribe someone in the USAF to give them the tanker contract. Now Amazon is adopting Microsoft-like tactics. It's not just three of the city's major businesses are so grossly unethical, it's that they do it so stupidly that they end up losers.By chris work
i have added a form on my blog that will contact the washington state attorney general. we have to start somewhere. http://www.amazontroopsurge.comSee Also
Related
- YouWriteOn.com calls for Amazon boycott
- German literary porn hit to HC
- Authors Guild attacks Amazon's p.o.d. move
- The Works owes £20 million
- Random to publish first Wiki book
Book news from the BBC
- Ex-minister writes Mandela book
- Global warming threat to climbing
- Wrong winner book event defended
- Bereaved father publishes story
- Crofter's road inspires Africans
Latest Comments
- I wouldn't be at all surprised in Tony Morris is the next one to be thrown...
- Yes, Martin Palmer was sacked because of poor sales. People do not...
- David - You're probably right, film age-banding did not cause such...
- Mr Neil may be "looking to get back £750,000 from United Agents" but my...
- Books are not shoes. They are not shirts. They have no sell-by, nor...
RSS
Subscriber Content