News

« Headlines

More criticism of Orange prize

Debate over the role of the Orange prize continues, as A S Byatt told the Times that the Orange was a sexist prize, saying that she was so critical of what it stands for that she forbids her publishers to submit her novels for consideration. "Such a prize was never needed," she told the newspaper, noting that many works of literature were by women.

John Sutherland, the academic, said that ghettoising women writers did them more harm them good. Anita Brookner, a Booker winner, has dismissed positive discrimination and is also believed to have declined having her novels entered for the Orange.

However, the all-women Orange literature prize is still needed, despite women winning prizes in fair competition with men, the organisers have said.

Harriet Hastings, project director of the Orange prize, shrugged off the criticisms, maintaining that it was international and had no need to justify its existence: "Although major prizes have been won by women, the value of the Orange is as a celebration of women’s fiction."

She dismissed the suggestion that there would be an outcry from women if anyone tried to introduce a prize for the best male novel, saying that she would actually welcome it.

Times

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By Jon

If the Orange was a 'right on' prize doling out awards to worthy but dull novels then fair enough, have a dig. But it's not - it's one of the awards highlights of the year, always comes up with an exciting list and usually is won by the right book. It's turned into an event award, like the Booker, gets people talking about, reading and buying books - you can't knock that.

18 Mar 08 09:00

Unsuitable?

See Also