News

« Headlines

Waterstone's 4% festive growth

Waterstone's has reported a positive Christmas despite what the business called a "highly competitive book market". In the five weeks to 5th January like-for-like sales at the bookshop chain were up by 4%, with actual growth of 0.5%. Gerry Johnson, managing director, said he was "delighted" by the numbers, putting the growth down to its internet arm, a strong promotional message, and the local influence of individual booksellers.

Johnson told The Bookseller: "We did extremely well with the big titles, much better than in the previous year. But at the same time we did well with the mid-range titles, which did well across the board this Christmas." Johnson praised publishers for offering a "good list" of titles that gave the chain's booksellers "lots of opportunities" to drive footfall. Johnson said that he was pleased that the business had still grown (by 0.5%), despite the store closures made over the year.

The high street chain is the first of the big booksellers in the UK to reveal its figures, and vindicates the view that book retailing fared particularly well in an otherwise difficult Christmas for retailers. Waterstone's numbers are well ahead of Nielsen Bookscan's high street indicator the General Retail Market, which recorded sales growth of 1.1% in December, and just marginally behind the wider Total Consumer Market, which saw growth of 5%.

In the ten weeks to 5th January Waterstone's recorded like-for-like sales growth of 3.3%, with actual sales flat. The chain also reported that its gross margin was up 30 basis points (0.3%).

The bookseller has now reported like-for-like sales growth in its last three trading updates, with like-for-like growth of 1.4% in its half year to 27th October, and growth of 0.6% in the period between 28th April and 23rd June. Last Christmas the chain reported like-for-like sales decline of 2% over the five-week festive period. Johnson said he was pleased to be able to report positive figures after a number of difficult years, but said that things would remain tricky on the high street. "It is not going to get any easier, but I can't see why we can't be successful."

Waterstone's performance was more than matched by its sister chain HMV, which showed like-for-like growth of 14.1%. In total the HMV Group reported actual sales growth of just shy of 10% over Christmas, putting the rest of the high street to shame.

Chief executive Simon Fox said: "Less than a year into our transformation programme the initiatives we are undertaking to revitalise our business have helped to deliver a highly successful Christmas. Having stabilised the business, we will continue to focus on revitalising our store propositions as well as growing new channels to market and carefully managing margins and costs. The group is, therefore, well positioned for the next phase of its turnaround."

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By Paul S

My calculator is clearly not working properly. I do not see how 0.5% is "well ahead" of the GRM's +1.1%..... Closing stores where they overlap with existing ones is always going to help LFL.

17 Jan 08 13:15

Unsuitable?

By philip.jones@bookseller.co.uk

I don't get the problem. It is pretty obvious that I am taking like-for-like as the comparable measure, just as I did last year when Waterstone's actual sales rose by 40% (thanks to Ottakar's), but it reported negative like-for-like growth. If your point is that LFL isn't a valid figure to use, then I'd love to hear the arguments . . .I'm reading the FT, and like-for-like is all they use: they don't even quote the 0.5% figure. So what gives?

17 Jan 08 15:12

Unsuitable?

By I'm A Tree

I think that there is an argument that whilst LFLs are generally a true measure they can be manipulated. If you have two stores in a town each taking £1m, and you close one, and the original shop now takes £1.5m then the 'LFL' is 50%. There would need to be a lot of closures for that to really impact on the group though.

17 Jan 08 16:43

Unsuitable?

By philip.jones@bookseller.co.uk

You might call it good business rather than manipulation.

17 Jan 08 17:28

Unsuitable?

See Also