Help navigation
Blogs
Unhappy feet
20.12.11 | John Pateman
The latest book issue figures from Lewisham libraries should give cause for concern to those local authorities who are thinking about transferring their public library services to "community ownership". Borrowing figures released by Lewisham show catastrophic falls in book loans at all the libraries which were transferred from council control in May. At Blackheath Library, the number of loans fell by a factor of 10, from 5,044 to just 572—a decrease of nearly 90%.
I would be the first to say that the quality of a library service should not be assessed solely on the number of books issued. But a decrease of this magnitude indicates that community management of public libraries simply does not work. It may be too early to judge the success of this experiment, but it looks like the good people of Lewisham have voted—with their feet. The irony, of course, is that while these libraries are now run by a range of new owners—a computer recycling firm, Age Concern and community volunteers—the legal responsibility for the library service remains firmly with Lewisham Council.
Lewisham may have made some short-term financial savings from this new governance model, but the buck still stops with them under the 1964 Public Libraries Act. No doubt they are hoping that the recently announced DCMS review of the 1964 Act will lead to amendments (or repeal) which will free them from their statutory duty to provide a comprehensive and efficient public library service to local residents.
Lewisham were early adopters of community management which forms part of the government's vision of the "Big Society". Many other councils are looking to follow Lewisham into this brave new world, including Doncaster (set to hand control of 12 libraries to community groups), the Isle of Wight (scrapped direct council funding to five libraries), Bolton (invited community groups to submit business plans to run five libraries), Camden (set aside £150,000 to help community groups run three libraries) and Hampshire (two libraries will close unless volunteers are recruited to run them). Others—like Brent, which closed six of its 12 libraries—have not even considered community management.
We certainly live in interesting times. While libraries continue to close, it was announced that the sale of books to the teenage market has gone up. This was balanced by a warning from the National Literacy Trust that almost four million children do not own a book. It said that poor youngsters were more likely to miss out. The trust's latest report raises concerns that the number of children without books is rising—from 10% in 2004 to 33% today. Boys are more likely to be without books than girls, and children eligible for free school meals are more likely not to own a book than their richer peers.
That is why public libraries must stay democratically accountable, publicly funded and free at the point of need.


Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
Peter and I have lost count of how many times we have put forward this same message over the last 18 months since Lewisham embarked on its mad-cap scheme to destroy its library service, and Samson-like, bring the national edifice with it!
We warned, we predicted we gave up our lives in this cause to network, to write, to blog, to lobby the DCMS, ministers, MPs - the Prime MInister even! Cassandra-like we did not stop over the 18 months and thank goodness for stalwarts in Lewisham like Alan Dove and Anne Bennet who hung in there,helped to challenge the dogma, not to say lies,of the politicians who really do have another agenda AND IT IS NOT IN LIBRARY USERS INTERESTS.
At last John Pateman, a professional in the library world, jumps aboard the band wagon already loaded with libray users, campaigners and supporters and activists - because this is what we have learnt to do in defence of our service and taxes.
Welcome aboard Mr. Pateman, what took you so long?
Patricia Richardson
I agree with the comments made by Patricia Richardson. I am a Lewisham resident and have visited three of the "community" lbraries. Like has in no sense been replaces by like either regarding stock or quality of advice. I do not regard such facilities as true libraries. I was shocked to see the statistics.
Judith Deschamps
I have been a Key Stage 1 Librarian for 7 years. Key stage two for 1 1/2 years.Rural communities especially, will be hit hard with the closure of Libraries and those run by volunteers.At my local High school figures of 28% and 26% for the last couple of academic years see school pupils arriving at Key stage 3 with a reading age under 10.Where no SLS service exists and where there is no provision of a qualified Librarian operating a School Library and no public branch Library I can see the figures getting worse within the next few years. I continue to lobby the Government with my Key Stage 1 Library scheme to aid and increase Literacy levels by up to 20%.Like all good ideas it is simple in it`s format ,is value for money and has massive impact.Statutory provision of School Libraries and qualified Librarians running them must take place if we are to survive in a digital economy.
Post new comment