Blogs

The power of print

The oldies have fought back—successfully. A dyke has been dug by the nation's old folk to prevent the incursion of the online world. British banks had unilaterally (not that they are a cartel, you understand) proposed that cheques would be withdrawn by October 2018, with all transactions migrating to the internet. This would have made life unliveable for many old folk—including my bed-ridden mother, who cannot use the internet, let alone visit an ATM. In the face of much strident waving of walking sticks, the banks backed down in July. You probably knew much of that.

Less well publicised has been another line in the sand drawn by grey power. The Financial Reporting Council oversees the way in which British companies report their performance to their shareholders. The cost of producing and sending annual reports to shareholders is immense. Indeed British posties are said to fear that time of the year when they have to cart the granddaddy of them all—HSBC's telephone directory-sized tome—to their customers' letter boxes. Not that all of its 396 pages are read by many; they are very, very dull, and mostly incomprehensible to all except market professionals.
The FRC proposed some time ago that printed annual reports could be abolished, and shareholders would be expected to read a digital version online. In the face of widespread opposition, they were forced to drop the proposal at the beginning of September.

It was said that it “would disadvantage small shareholders, many of whom are elderly and/or have limited access to the internet”. It is not just shareholders who  have commented that they would rather read long and complex documents in printed form. Indeed, a few companies are facing a degree of resistance for sending their directors an iPad, and expecting them to read board papers on that.

So two lines have been drawn in the sand to preserve the printed word as the medium of choice—for at least one segment of the population. To mix metaphors—am I clutching at straws? Yes. Those who have children addicted to BlackBerry Messenger as the communicative method of choice will find it difficult to believe that that generation will ever lose a preference to read (and write) digitally. Just think of their frustration when that generation hits the stage of infirmity, and arthritis prevents a quick chat with their friend in another care home!

What to take from this? That there are many—at least for the moment—who retain a preference for printed matter. But sadly this segment is not big enough to prevent those lines in the sand being overcome by the “perfect storm” so movingly described by Simon Gaul in his elegiac news feature in The Bookseller on his late and lamented Travel Bookshop.  

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.thebookseller.com/trackback/57266

Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"

But ebook uptake is actually highest amongst over-50s.

Preserved - what's your source of information?

I refuse to rejoice at the news that a 400-page book is being printed, delivered to and thrown away unread by vast numbers of people. What a stupid waste of resources. What a pathetic thing to congratulate oneself on. Just because people got into the habits of wastefulness and thoughtless consumption in 1960 doesn't make it alright now!

(Actually, I have no problem with keeping stuff on paper for those who need it, but clearly it should be on an opt-in basis. )

It wasn't just "oldies" who vetoed the abolition of cheques - many small businesses and organisations such as charities, clubs and churches wouldn't easily have been able to manage without some paper based replacement. The banks conceded this and agreed they'd have to develop an alternative: perhaps they then realised they'd essentially just be reinventing the cheque.

So it's not a matter of preserving the printed word as a "medium of choice", as though this was just fashion, more one of preserving it where there is a clear role which can't be met by any e-alternative.

This is desperate stuff. The whole article reeks of la la la not listening denial. I wonder if you really understand the kind of impression that articles like this create (see my blog post http://mumbly.posterous.com/on-first-looking-at-thebooksellercom).

Rather than focussing on what things will still stay in conventional print (and very soon, that will be a very short list) wouldn't it be better to focus on where books are going, what's in their future. It might also be interesting to write an article about the huge potential benefits ebooks and ebook readers offer to the older generation (huge print, read-aloud, extremely cheap access to out-of-print back catalogues).

Post new comment

Due to persistent spam problems we are now asking users to register before submitting comments. If you have already registered or are a subscriber then please log in now. Otherwise you can use the simple form below to register when you submit your comment. Your comment will go live once you click the validation link in the email. Comments still go live without moderation.
You should use this name when logging into your account.
This name will be displayed when you comment on the site.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.