Help navigation
Blogs
From the Bottom Up
03.06.11 | Martin Latham
The East India Company, based in London, could never decide about "the man on the spot" in India. He knew the local people better than anyone—he spoke their language—but could he be trusted? He resisted company policy where it conflicted with local conditions.
The introduction of pork-greased cartridges in 1857 typified the growing arrogance of the central authorities, and the Indian Mutiny ensued. Thus ended the golden age of Anglo-Indian understanding. The East India Company stopped talking to their customers, instead blowing them out of cannons.
When I did my PhD on the Raj, I failed to understand this centralising tendency. Having witnessed seven m.d.s running Waterstone's, I now see that it takes cojones to trust the man on the spot. But it's worth the risk: 4,000 intelligent booksellers are better employed talking to customers rather than installing the same planogram, or filling in a spreadsheet called "passion for books". To measure the commerciality of localism in Waterstone's: work a Saturday in a branch, and please regard bottom-line profit as the supreme "Key Performance Indicator". A fellow manager once bravely asked at the end of a managers' gathering: "So let me get this straight: profit is the fifth KPI?"
Booksellers, being skint, are surprisingly commercial. When Tim Waterstone bonused card sales they went through the roof: I've never seen such assiduously filled card spinners and such locally appropriate cards. Even a notional element of profit-share would massively engage booksellers, more than corporate "values".
Booksellers know, too, not to be publisher-led. Publishers, the source of great wonders—but also of ever-swelling rivers of imitative ordure—want Waterstone's as showrooms. Booksellers must resist this and save money so that they can stock a decent offering of solid, saleable literature. Too often we have run out of, say, Dracula, but have 11 years' stock of the new Jamie Oliver. Last month, holidaying in Pakistan, I was struck by the magnificence of the bookshops' range, free from both the endless roundabout of returns and the absurdity of celebrity. Back in the UK, Brigitte Nielsen's £19 autobiography has so little to say that it is illustrated with her mangy mutts. Tumescent frontlists, over-caffeinated sales directors, rapacious agents and over-bidding editors are publishers' problems—not Waterstone's.
The future is bright for Waterstone's. Last Saturday I kept hearing customers saying—as they do in any branch—"I could spend all day in here," and "I shouldn't come in here, I always end up buying more than I meant to". The ideal atmosphere in branches, with booksellers enjoying their jobs, is energised and innovating, a place where people want to be. It avoids the twin extremes of "Black Books" and W H Smith's uniformed, Galaxy-bar-pushing hell. Despite some surreal Waterstone's strategic trips over the years,
customers' goodwill remains astonishing. And, despite the whole blowing-the-mutineers-out-of-a-cannon thing, Anglo-Indian relations are looking up, too.


Comments: Scroll down for the latest comments and to have your say
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller comments policy. Comments go direct to live please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable comments by clicking the links"
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first | Readers' most recommended
Brilliant Latham. You made my heart sing, keep up the good work
But the cartridges issued in 1857 were *not* greased with pork. That was the whole point. The fact that many sepoys believed otherwise was hardly the fault of the East India Company.
Yes, bit baffled you could do a PhD and not find that out.
Goodness, the posturing against KPIs by people within the business is bizarre. What point is Martin actually trying to make? How do retailers pursue profit? Through sales drivers of the kind that the reactionaries in the company oppose. If managers aren't concerned with such elementary measures of performance as the number of people coming through the doors, the number actually spending anything, and how much they are spending, isn't that rather alarming?
And much as it may be true that booksellers should be "talking to customers" one can only point to the mounting evidence that most booksellers simply ignore most customers - hence the hostility to the mystery shopping surveys that have established that fact.
Localism is certainly important, but might it not just be the case that what customers want in Canterbury or Kensington is different from what customers want in Sunderland.
@bookseller. It's not KPI's and mystery shops that are a problem in themselves. It is how they are being used and interpreted from above in a way that is a hindrance rather than a help. Also, the "mounting evidence" you describe that booksellers ignore customers is contradicted by the actual overwhelming feedback from customer surveys saying Waterstones booksellers give some of the best service on the high street. The mystery shop results are actually pretty good overall and some of the bad scores actually have some good customer service in them if you read the reports, it's just the box ticking structure of the mystery shop is flawed and open to subjective interpretation.
They were greased with both pig fat and cattle grease, so the authorities, opposed by Colonel Birch, whose letters I have read in MS, managed to piss off both Hindus ans Muslims together. Please do send me your sources.And also what you mean by "the whole p0int"
best wishes Dr MC Latham
Interesting faux working class credentials ("sunderland") but I sniff a Head Office apparatchik. Do you work in a shop, putting books in carrier bags? No real bookseller would frottage KPI's thus.
Latham
Not sure what to say. Any history of India will confirm the connection between the cartridges and the Mutiny. Or my Phd is on the open shelves at the Senate House . Latham
book-seller. Try a fake moustache and glasses next time.
"They were greased with both pig fat and cattle grease, so the authorities, opposed by Colonel Birch, whose letters I have read in MS, managed to piss off both Hindus ans Muslims together."
Please do post your sources
Excellent piece Martin, glad there are still booksellers like you left in the business after the debacle of the last few years.
I know all the booksellers in our branch are pleased that we have someone who loves books running the company and equally delighted to see the back of HMV, it's a real shame we didn't depart from them much earlier as trust me they have left us in a bloody mess.
It remains to be seem if the new leader can turn things round but I'm sure he's aware of how deplorably treated the bookstore staff have been in the last couple of years, both in their terms and conditions and the bullying culture so prevalent from some of the BMs, RMs and DMs throughout the company(they know who they are). Many of these people haven't the slightest interest in books - he'll find that out very quickly when he takes over. Hopefully what goes around comes around for these retail experts who have driven the business in to the ground, they can take their purple t-shirts,chocolate,ideal rotas,ridiculous targets, core values and quarterly DVDs with them on their next jobs.
Hope James D has a good chat with you Martin and others like you once he takes up the reins. We then might have a chance.....
Why don't you try reading his PhD? I would assume there's a bibliography or something at the end.
Equally, perhaps you would care to post your sources showing that this claim is not, in fact, true?
I want a t-shirt that says "ever swelling rivers of imitative ordure". That is all. Carry on.
Speaking as an editor, I think that may be one of my KPIs.
11 years cover, Martin? With 671 sales and 7 on hand, you're not quite there yet. Compare that with your Dracula sales over the last few months. There's local bookselling and then there's beligerent anti-commerialism. I'll look forward to you ordering up soon.
I will put my hands up to being a little unseemly in how I expressed myself. Apologies for that. However I think it equally unsightly for a manager to publicly hector what are after all his own colleagues, and who number rather fewer than the team he looks after at Canterbury.
Why assume he's a manager? Plenty of people work there. Most are not managers and are junior to Martin. Who's picking on who here? Either way this isn't the place for it and neither is it the place for a senior store manager to be sounding off. Pathetic
Slightly infra dig, old boy, to call yourself 'Dr'. It's like turning up to regional meetings in a gown.
What I mean by 'the whole point' is that lots of Indian soldiers thought the new cartridges were greased with beef or pork. They were mistaken. The cartridges were actually coated with beeswax, or had no grease on them at all. 'The whole point' is that the East India Company did not provoke the mutiny through its distant and out of touch leadership. Hence it is a very weak historical example for you to have chosen.
As for sources, a quick trawl through wikipedia / google in search of 'greased cartridges indian mutiny' should suffice. I cannot imagine why Colonel Birch thought the cartridges were greased with animal fat. He was clearly misinformed.
A good example of an Urban Myth becoming a fact.
A little research on the web and in libraries is all it takes. Just because Col. Birch said that it was animal fat and the good Dr put it in his PhD does not make it so. The cartridges were lubricated with beeswax, that IS a fact.
Yes Kip, some are also women.
The unwanted impact so clearly illustrated by the Chinese whispers on here (and those in Martin's indicative tale) show a lack of trust between store and centre that is based on misunderstanding and perception rather than reality. Just because someone works in a shop/office doesn't make them wrong or right, but that does not seems to be the understanding by anyone taking a position here. Calm down dears; whoever greased your cartridges, with whatever they greased them with, probably has the same interests at heart.
Post new comment