Blogs

Graeme Neill

Graeme Neill is retail reporter of The Bookseller.

The one dimensional Reader

I've always been a bit of a technology fan. I can't seem to leave my house without my iPod nestled in my pocket and two years ago spent hours fruitlessly trying to get my hands on the Nintendo Wii after it launched. So I'm probably what marketing types call an “early adopter” – the type of person who buys shiny new electronic toys before they cross over into the mainstream.

So the Sony Reader should be right up my street then. First impressions are good. It's extremely user friendly – you can take it straight from the box and begin reading almost immediately. The menu navigation system is easy to use, albeit a wee bit fiddly. You flick through the menus of books and their chapters using buttons just to the right of the screen. Occasionally I ended up at the wrong part of a book but I would put that down to me rather than the device.

As for the reading experience I decided to go back to Agatha Christie's brilliant The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, one of the samples preloaded on the Reader. Similar to Amazon's Kindle you forget you are using an electronic device after a few minutes. The screen does a weird flash to black as you turn each page but it's strangely pleasant. While there is a lag between hit the 'turn the page' button and the next page coming onscreen, you soon learn when to time your presses to coincide with finishing the final sentence of the screen.

It is definitely the sleekest looking device on the market. My flatmate seemed pretty impressed by it on looks alone when I showed it to her. While it does look like prop from a 1980's science fiction movie, it's much better aesthetically than the iLiad or Kindle.

All positives then. So will I spend £199 on one? Probably not. My problem isn't with the Sony Reader itself, it's actually a criticism of this entire generation of e-book readers. When I bought my iPod I spent a preposterous amount of time uploading some 30 days worth of music onto it. But then I was good to go – my entire record collection in my pocket. If I buy the Reader and want to reread David Winner's excellent Brilliant Orange (if you read one book this year on Dutch football etc etc), I need to buy it in e-book format, despite it sitting on my bookshelf in my living room.

Publishers' intentions to keep e-book prices at parity to its physical counterpart may be a good idea for them to avoid rampant discounting but it's not great for the humble consumer. To pay near enough £200 for a device and then fork out more money to add books I already own to it? Not exactly fair.

My other concern is how much use I would get from it. I like reading only a book at a time so the ability to jump from Jonathan Lethem to Richard Yates at the push of a button is not a major selling point. The portability is great but things like reading in the bath or on the beach are a wee bit risky to say the least.

But I think the overarching problem is it is just an e-book reader. That's it. The iPhone has shown that you can have technological Swiss Army Knife in your pocket with internet access, mp3s, mobile phone and camera. But if I want to look online for more details on something interesting I read in a book, forget it.

It's a shame because at a £200 pricepoint (or considerably more in the case of the iLiad) I would expect a bit more from a device. It is fun and easy to use and is the best-looking product on the market. However, until either e-book prices drop or a fancier version comes out offering web access I'll probably remain on the sidelines. Guess I'm not an early adopter after all.

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By imatree

Whilst not able to comment on the usability or beauty of the reader I broadly agree with what you say. However, having to shell out again for e-editions is analogous to the introduction of CDs and DVDs, and hasn't created a barrier there to people adopting and rebuying in new formats. Many people replaced their whole record collections with CDs, whilst for most of us there are only a limited number of books we would want to re-read. I certainly have several books on the go at once, and would value taking a wide range of books on holiday. I agree that the major problem isversatility v the cost. This will be a definitive barrier to the mass market.

04 Sep 08 08:29

Unsuitable?

By Martyn Daniels

You have described transient technology and we all remeber the good old 8 track, cassette tapes, betamax. They will sell but will not be used. They are one dimensional but the big draw back is that they are being launched in a vaccum. Where's the content? We all expect everyone to sit around whilstthe publishers play catch up and the market invents the next device or moves onto the mobile. Finally why would you want 200 books on a player - i always thought you read books one at a time.

04 Sep 08 09:38

Unsuitable?

By Toby

I'm not sure what you mean by 'Where's the content' - there's masses of it if you look in the right places. In another article today you'll see that Random House and Penguin (to name but two) are launching hundreds of ebooks to coincide with the release of the Sony Reader - I know that RH will be making something in the region of 1500 available over the coming weeks. The problem is not that publishers are playing catch-up, more that the booksellers aren't pushing the product - and given the cost discussions in this article, you can kind of see why! Even if you take 'catch up' out of the equation, how quickly do you read? Even at a book a day it would easily take you a couple of years to get through the list that's already available!

04 Sep 08 10:37

Unsuitable?

By GraemeNeill

Waterstone's has roughly 7,000 titles onsite today. It aims to have around 20,000 by the end of the year.

04 Sep 08 11:21

Unsuitable?

By Mcthew

I don't think the Sony e-reader will take off until it's embraced by the internet-writing community. The format is ideal for self-publishing, i.e. blogs, fanzines, short fiction, long fiction etc etc. If authors begin selling or freely distributing fiction in this way for surfers to download to the e-reader then it will take off. It's easier to carry around a paperback sized e-reader than it is a clutch of A4 printed pages...

04 Sep 08 12:57

Unsuitable?

By Adrian Graham

I think this device will sell initially to the converted. Most of the negative comments people are making are the same kinds of things people (me included) said about the iPod when it came out. It may take time but sooner of later many, many of us will be reading from eReaders or the like. Then one day, as happened with records, the publishers will simply stop making them and we'll all be forced to buy CDs ... or eBooks. I'll miss having the physical object of 'the book' but times change. I don't miss not having physical CDs with MP3s. I say well done to Sony and Waterstones for proactively getting into this ... If they don't Amazon will clean them out. Were going to be in for a lot of changes but it might take longer then people realise. http://www.adriangraham.co.uk/

04 Sep 08 14:26

Unsuitable?

By Jon

I think saying that 'the overarching problem is it is just an e-book reader' is missing the point entirely - the beauty of the product is just that; it enables you to read books digitally, it does it simply and effectively, at a comparably affordable price, in a size that is easy to carry.

04 Sep 08 15:27

Unsuitable?

By Alex

Adrian - I see where you're coming from regarding the Tape/CD thing - eventually tapes were no longer available and people just had to buy CDs. However do you really think the book will become obsolete in the same way a cassette did? I honestly can't see a future where there aren't physical books...

04 Sep 08 15:53

Unsuitable?

By Jane

I think the glory of the e-reader is that you can read what I think of as 'transient' books - novels that you only want to read once, for instance - and then delete the item rather than having to find storage space for it or pass it on to someone else. I'd certainly use it to read books that I'm quite interested in, rather than very - and if I really liked something on closer acquaintance, I would certainly want to buy it in paper form too! I don't think it will cannibalise sales; I think it will encourage more people to take chances with their reading, as they do with the music they listen to. And the wonder of printed books will go on forever!

05 Sep 08 12:45

Unsuitable?

By Andy K

I've just had a play on one in Waterstone's. For £200 it's not very impressive. My guess: it's doomed to failure unless they change the business model entirely and take the mobile phone approach: buy credit for 20 book downloads and you get the reader for free. And even then, theyll need to reduce the price of the e-books. Downloads for the same price as physical copies? Surely they're joking. I write as someone who's actually been reading e-books for several years. My Palm PDA permanently has a selection of short stories on it, ready for when I'm stuck for entertainment on a train journey - most of them downloaded from long-established e-book purveyor www.fictionwise.com for trivial amounts of money (or in some cases, for free). Of course if Sony had adopted one of the existing e-book formats then there'd be a whole library of choices already available from the likes of Fictionwise, but no, they had to go and create yet another one.

05 Sep 08 12:58

Unsuitable?

By Marky

I have been sitting on the fence for a while about owning one of these. The points made about iPod and eReaders are valid. I listen to all my music which is why I have 160GB of it carried around with me, however would I read all my books? No. I read one or perhaps two at a time so using the argument that this allows me to carry my whole library with me would not work. I wouldn't and I don't care for it. What does interest me is the ability to reduce the load in my bag from a thick heavy book to a just the light reader. Try carrying Dostoyevsky's Demons around each day and see how attractive the reader suddenly appears. As to content, well I agree that buying a ebook version of something I already have is something that one would have to think about at the time, however like the CD and Vinyl comparrison, we've done it before. However in this case ebooks are not replacing existing real ones. Noone is phasing out books. Perhaps it's a little idolistic but I see no reason why an eBook cannot be supplied with a hard back version of a book. Paperback wouldn't be cost effective, but no harm shoving a 30p CD in the back of the book is there? Failing that a code for the website where one can download the ebook alternative. Perhaps that's just too much 'blue sky thinking' as the bosses at the publishers would think. I would consider buying some eBooks though in favour of paperbacks but the price must come down to reflect the real costs of ebooks. Hard back books would always remain something I would buy. £200 isn't a bad price but I agree it ccould be less, but as a friend in a Sony Store told me, the margins on these things are tiny so there isn't much room for a lower price presently, however in a time of tightening budgets perhaps they can?

07 Nov 08 07:04

Unsuitable?

See Also