Blogs
State of denial
21.08.08
I used to think the two laws of British publishing were that (1) things are never as bad as they seem and (2) things can always get worse. These principles were underpinned by the maturity of the British book industry and the fact that with its over-educated, overworked, underpaid legions, trade publishers are prone to bouts of pessimism.
However, the tectonic plates of the industry are shifting and it seems increasingly clear to me that trade publishing as a whole is in denial about the weakness of its existing business model, and the scale of the demographic and technological changes confronting it.
One of the results of the seismic rupture in the music industry is that a single company, Apple, came to dominate both software delivery (via iTunes) and the hardware on which it is consumed (the iPod and, crucially for publishing, the iPhone), at a time when manufacturers and artists were at their weakest.
Newspapers, meanwhile, are finding that the internet is hollowing out their business model, flattening newsstand sales, and consuming advertising revenue.
Does all this sound familiar? Despite the attentions of publishing's best minds, trade houses, as well as authors and agents have adopted a wait-and-see approach to the future. This is not altogether unwise (CD-Roms, anyone?). But when Apple has sold millions of iPhone and iTouch handsets, and their besotted owners are desperate for content, it's odd there aren't already 10,000 e-book titles available. The prevailing wisdom is that the internet's impact on trade publishing is primarily about marketing. This could be a serious mistake.
When these technological changes are combined with a risk assessment of our advance-against-royalty/sale-or-return business model; demographic variations in our reading habits; the effects of supermarket competition on specialist retailing; the ugly fight over territorial exclusivity between US and UK publishers; and the immense difficulties of launching original new writing in this country, such insouciance about the future seems dangerously misplaced.
We are not all doomed. In the week that I write this, Random House Group has reported a 16.7% operating profit, while an independent outfit such as Profile managed nearly 10%. But the fact that the new e-commerce companies seem so brash and foreign to established publishing firms reveals the contours of future relationships. A number of successful publishers will soon find themselves trying to win a game that no longer exists.
Comments on this article
By Adrian Graham
But why should publishers 'change' if they're making good money NOW? Digital delivery of 'books' will become a reality, especially when screen display technology becomes better than print (which it will, not now, but later) and we further grow in love with an Internet-like reading experience, searchable texts, etc. At the moment, however, this is still unexplored land, a risk. http://www.adriangraham.co.uk/22 Aug 08 10:09
See Also
TOBY MUNDY
Recent Blogs
- What doesn't kill us . . .
- Reading list
- Depth charge
- Hurrah for Lynette Owen
- Festive pet subject
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- Making publishing pay
- A token gesture
- Making writing pay
- Death of the publisher?
Latest Comments
- It's a double-edged sword though, isn't it? It would be great if returns didn't come in, or...
- I fear removal of backlist from bookshops would mean that the 'more space for big promotions'...
- "Wouldn't it be nice if the industry makes progress on improving this rather Dickensian state...
- "revenue from Christmas sales lodged in the bank" Indie bookselling has challenges; so too...
- I fear a removal of backlist could kill many people's motivation to visit bookshops. Not...
RSS
Subscriber Content