Blogs
Duncan Clark
Duncan Clark is editorial director of GreenProfile and a consultant editor at the Guardian.
Books are not music
14.08.08
I’m the sort of person who should be excited about e-books. A hopeless technology junkie, I’ve written books about iPods and am rarely off the internet. I’m also a committed green (yes, I’m aware of the contradiction), so I find paperless publishing an appealing concept.
But despite the Kindle’s imminent UK launch, I’m not excited at all. On the contrary, I’m increasingly bored of digital-publishing hype. Especially the endless references to the coming "iPod moment", when e-readers will suddenly become as ubiquitous as Apple’s white earphones.
Comparisons between iPods and e-book readers are flawed on so many levels that it’s hard to know where to start. Given the limited space, I’ll highlight just three key differences.
First, the iPod was a technology waiting to happen. Its predecessor—the personal CD player—was fiddly, skip-prone, unsexy and required you to carry around loads of delicate discs. E-book readers, by comparison, are competing with one of the best-loved products ever developed. Books are cheap, convenient and robust. When you’ve finished reading them, you can give them to friends or display them on your bookshelves.
Second, iPods aren’t just for downloads. They also enable you to make better use of the music you already own. All those housebound albums are suddenly available on the train or car, on holiday, or at work. E-book readers, by contrast, do nothing for your existing books: you’re just buying a receptacle for future downloads.
Third, iPods’ many benefits don’t come at the expense of the listening experience. The music on an iPod sounds the same as ever, whereas e-book readers downgrade the visual and tactile experience of reading. Out with multiple formats and papers, and beautiful typography; in with a single-size plastic "page" and a small font selection.
Even if the iPod/Kindle comparison was valid, it would miss the point that iPods are already yesterday’s news. The future is represented by the iPhone, which is all about convergence: phone, iPod, internet and more in one tiny device. E-book readers fly in the face of convergence by requiring people to buy, charge, maintain and carry a separate gadget for just one purpose.
Publishing’s long-term future may indeed be digital. But that doesn’t mean anyone will succeed in selling e-books in propriety formats for expensive, single-purpose gadgets. No wonder we still haven’t seen sales figures for the Kindle: they’re likely to be unimpressive.
Comments on this article
By Adrian Graham
I've been blogging about this very thing. There's also the unexpected as well - we simply don't know what's going to happen. I was excited about eBooks when the Palm Pilot came out! Now the digital eBook future is closer I'm less ... what's the word? ... Inspired. I use and enjoy technology but I've got a feeling it will come down to cost savings and availability in the end. At some point in the future publishers won't bother to print books anymore. That was the moment (with a large vinyl collection) I moved from records to CD. Meanwhile ... The Kindle is being hyped in the US as the big Christmas hit. http://www.adriangraham.co.uk/14 Aug 08 15:44
By Adrienne Kinney
Mr. Clark evidently doesn't own a Kindle. True, an e-book device doesn't do anything for your existing book collection, but I beg to disagree with his assumptoin that the printed book is always superior to offerings on a Kindle or Reader. For image-dependent content that may well be true temporarily until technology catches up. But for many of us who own ebook devices as well as hundreds of print books, there's still plenty to like about the Kindle, for example. For one thing, it also does email and web surfing, brings me newspapers and blogs, plays music and audio, and allows me to buy new titles instantly. For voracious readers like me, there's plenty of content that I actually prefer to read on the Kindle vs. paper. And it sure beats dragging all those heavy, bulky paper formats around on the bus or train. In a word, I love it -- I'm addicted, in fact. Adoption of the Kindle may remain sluggish among a certain demographic, and yes the ipod has its followers too. I predict the next generation of e-readers (Kindle's progeny at least) will provide both higher resolution, streamlined convergence and an exploding fan base. And I for one can't wait! Go borrow a Kindle and try it. You just might agree.15 Aug 08 13:02
By Matt Wardman
Think first step to an i-Library, not an i-Book. Imagine the benefits when moving house.15 Aug 08 16:24
By Jo
Jeez Duncan, thanks for spending some of your precious time explaining all this to us poor proles out here: next week how about how ebook readers aren't elephants. The term 'the iPod moment' is emblematic of a transitional shift--not necessarily to the actual iPod itself but to something else, anything really, other than what it was previously. Geddit? So, to be clear, the Kindle is exactly that iPod moment because for the first time there is a suggestion that a genuine shift is taking place. I guess this will learn us to take lessons from a committed green who isn't actually a green.15 Aug 08 21:51
See Also
Duncan Clark
Recent Blogs
- What doesn't kill us . . .
- Reading list
- Depth charge
- Hurrah for Lynette Owen
- Festive pet subject
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- Making publishing pay
- A token gesture
- Making writing pay
- Death of the publisher?
Latest Comments
- It's a double-edged sword though, isn't it? It would be great if returns didn't come in, or...
- I fear removal of backlist from bookshops would mean that the 'more space for big promotions'...
- "Wouldn't it be nice if the industry makes progress on improving this rather Dickensian state...
- "revenue from Christmas sales lodged in the bank" Indie bookselling has challenges; so too...
- I fear a removal of backlist could kill many people's motivation to visit bookshops. Not...
RSS
Subscriber Content