Blogs
Philip Jones
Philip Jones is the managing editor of theBookseller.com. He will blog with links and comment about the book business.
The Booker circus
29.07.08
And so the Booker circus begins with the publication of the Man Booker Dozen, a longlist consisting of 13 titles, some of which seem highly unlikely to make it to the shortlist stage.
The knives are already out for the judges, with the inclusion of thriller Child 44 likely to raise the wrath of purists and publishers. As Canongate's Jamie Byng would have it: "I cannot respect a judging committee that decides to pick a book like Child 44 . . ."
Literary editors will, though, be mostly pleased with the inclusion of heavyweights Salman Rushdie (The Enchantress of Florence), Amitav Ghosh (Sea of Poppies) and Philip Hensher (The Northern Clemency) among the titles. These three are almost certain to be among the six shortlisted books, though Rushdie did not make the cut [three*] years ago.
Independent presses Atlantic (The White Tiger), Faber (The Secret Scripture), Tindal Street Press (Girl in a Blue Dress), and Verso (From A to X) will also be delighted. For the Birmingham-based Tindal Street Press it is becoming a regular thing, having been longlisted last year for What Was Lost.
Save for Macmillan, the big publishers share the remaining longlisted titles pretty evenly: Random House has two (The Lost Dog, The Enchantress of Florence); Hachette has two (The Clothes on their Backs, Sea of Poppies); and HarperCollins has two (The Northern Clemency, Netherland). Penguin (A Fraction of the Whole) and Simon & Schuster (Child 44) have one each.
Which brings us to Child 44, a fine thriller, but only slightly maligned by Byng's view of it as "a fairly well-written and well-paced thriller that is no more than that". "One is entitled to care about a book if you are its publisher," he told me, explaining his disappointment that Helen Garner's The Spare Room had missed out.
It is not the first time the Booker judges have thrown in a curve-ball, usually aimed at stirring up controversy. The 2004 longlist had Neil Cross mixing it with eventual winner Alan Hollinghurst, and the shortlisted, Sarah Hall and David Mitchell. Writers clearly in a different league.
Here's my view: Child 44 will not win the 2008 Man Booker Prize. Rushdie, Ghosh and Hensher are the clear favourites, with Grant, Barry and Toltz likely to join them on the shortlist.
That said, bookies William Hill have installed Joseph O'Neill's Netherlands as their 3/1 favourite, with Salman Rushdie as second and Child 44 the third favourite.
Job done, Booker judges.
* See comments below on my errors.
Comments on this article
By Stewart
Rushdie didn't make the cut last year because he didn't have a book out last year. His last appearance on the longlist was Shalimar the Clown in 2005. As for Amitav Ghosh's Sea Of Poppies making the shortlist, its being the opener to a trilogy could harm its chances.30 Jul 08 11:12
By John Self
The edited version "Rushdie did not make the cut [two] years ago" is still wrong: 2005 was three years ago. Can we take from your sigh, Philip, that you find it tiresome to be corrected on facts? My view is that if someone is being paid to write about these things, they should know at least as much about it as readers do. As to the list itself, I was disappointed that there was only one book on there (the Gaynor Arnold) I hadn't heard of. Last year there were several, including the wonderful Animal's People, which I would never have known about if it hadn't been selected. Your projected shortlist would be a bit disappointing too, with mainly big names there (even Toltz is quickly becoming a big name with his debut, though I found it a bit too much of a good thing). For my money Joseph O'Neill has to be a strong contender. I didn't enjoy it as much as many people seem to have, but it's clearly been highly praised and I think it's a cert for the shortlist and a good bet for the prize itself.31 Jul 08 06:55
By philip.jones@bookseller.co.uk
Indeed, this is starting to feel like the Guardian's Corrections and Clarifications column. I was 'sighing" because it only seems like last year, not two, or even three years ago. Anyway, I've corrected the correction now, so thanks John,31 Jul 08 08:25
See Also
Philip Jones
- Edit or bust?
- Olympics: Is the trade missing out?
- A Jewel worth fighting over?
- Waterstone's plays its card
- In praise of women in publishing
Recent Blogs
- Campaigning for the Book
- Tunes set the tone
- Don't get depressed
- Pottering about no longer
- The one dimensional Reader
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- A token gesture
- Making publishing pay
- Making writing pay
- Death of the publisher?
Latest Comments
- I have always felt a little miffed that one of my own books, The Bombay Postal Circle its...
- I've just had a play on one in Waterstone's. For £200 it's not very impressive. My guess: it's...
- I think the glory of the e-reader is that you can read what I think of as 'transient' books -...
- Adrian - I see where you're coming from regarding the Tape/CD thing - eventually tapes were no...
- I think saying that 'the overarching problem is it is just an e-book reader' is missing the...
RSS
Subscriber Content