Blogs

Carlie Lee

Carlie Lee is an editor for Pen Friends UK, an editing and critique service for writers.

Writers' society

Following Laurence Orbach's Blog about re-defining business models, it seems it is time to look at the elements at the core of publishing; writers and their lost mentors.
 
It feels like a very American concept, but mentors have always played an important part in the life of an author; providing them with an experienced eye and impartial feedback. With the publishing industry making great leaps in the way it conducts its business, writers have been dramatically losing their mentors to tightened schedules and increased productivity.

Gentlemen's publishing is now the stuff of legend; priceless first editions crammed full of dedications to long-gone editors, and the relationship of those such as DH Lawrence and Edward Garnett, become deeply anachronistic in the landscape of modern publishing.
 
It was natural for writers to then turn to their agents, and literary agents filled the gap for a while, but have since been forced to retreat.  Occasionally writers can hear the odd whisper from behind the ramparts of unsolicited manuscript . . . but the agent's nervousness is understandable; the great unpublished are pressed against the portcullis and not one of them carries any guarantees.
 
Agent Rupert Heath feels, 'Agents can be good mentors from the point of view of preparing an author's work for publication,' but, he adds, 'an author has to be doing something which has strong publishable potential from the outset'. From Rupert's side of the wall, it simply isn't practical to mentor writers who don't immediately demonstrate their commercial abilities.
 
So where in this new world order do writers find someone who has time to help them? To advise them on exactly which darlings to murder, or jolly them along when plots tangle and characters revolt? It seems the answers lie within; writers are uniting in their need for mentorship, and are turning to each other for that vital support.
 
Thanks to internet-based writers' review sites, writers of all abilities and genres are able to share work and opinions; from sorting stilted dialogue, to warning each other off the agents with the longest rejection times.
 
Ted Smith from popular writers' site You Write On, rules his world like a benevolent despot. The site works by writers reviewing and rating their contemporaries' work, then being reviewed and rated in return. Six leading literary agencies are involved and offer professional critiques to those lucky few that make the Top Ten.
 
Ted believes, 'The peer review and professional critique system helps to mentor talented writers, while also bringing them to the attention of the publishing industry'. And it works. Aspiring novelist, Lexi Reveillan, is hugely supportive of Ted's work, and thinks the success of the site rides on the dizzying learning curve of reviewing others, 'This is not just a chore to earn a credit.  Analysing another's writing, sussing out what works and what doesn't, and why, is an education in itself'.
 
One of the biggest success stories to emerge from such a cosset of contemporaries is Guy Saville, winner of YouWriteOn's Book of The Year. He later went on to win an Escalator Literature Award which brought him official mentorship with Richard & Judy author Katharine McMahon. Although Guy was already with literary agents Curtis Brown, he found the addition of a mentoring relationship hugely productive. 'At some point your mentor has also been unpublished, so they understand your position better than an agent or editor can. The relationship has less to do with editing or networking than drawing on another writer's experience to help shape your own work.'
 
So how does this new style of mentoring fit the business models? Very well, it seems, as something similar has already been adopted by one of our major publishers, Harper Collins. Literary review sites can help in the selection of new writers; acting as electronic slush-piles, but it is their potential for mentorship which is really exciting, with practically no economic impact on the rest of the industry. At the core of our new business model we can find writers, mentored by writers.

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By Raz

Mentors? Hey, don't forget the family. Most of us have relatives. Make them read it and fill out a questionaire, or give them a pen and tell them you expect a comment on every page. A little blackmail/bribery may be necessary, but trust me, it works, and you'll get useful feedback.

10 Feb 08 12:52

Unsuitable?

By Alan Hutcheson

From my experience, both the biggest strength and the greatest potential weakness of this new model is that fact that it is so democratic. There are no real restrictions on who can participate and no limitations on what each individual can get out of the process. Indeed, whatever success the participants get out of this new Mentoring By Peers system is almost entirely dependent on what they themselves bring to the table and the choices they make while participating. Perseverance is undoubtedly high on the list of necessary traits in order to make this new system work. But that may very well have been the case in earlier times. Right along with perseverance would be an ability to overlook or at least work around its all-inclusive nature. It is possible, indeed likely, that many of the peer mentors will bring little of value to the table. Much time can be wasted, considerable angst created and legitimate talent potentially squashed by the self-serving, poorly prepared or ill-equipped amongst the participants. Writers hoping to take advantage of any peer review site had better be prepared to be able to sift the wheat from the chaff, the helpful from the inane, anodyne, spiteful and just plain old poorly informed. As I said, perseverance may be the key. Good work+exposure+stamina can indeed bring opportunities to deserving and talented writers, as evidenced by the successes fostered by YWO.

11 Feb 08 15:47

Unsuitable?

By Norm Benson

I agree with Alan on his assessment of the YouWriteOn community. It’s a learn-as-you-go system. And though I often am exasperated with reviews my work receives, I could not say a wrong word about Ted Smith if my mouth were filled with mud; he may be the most benevolent despot around. YouWriteOn.com benefits from Ted’s light touch. He’s a mensch.

11 Feb 08 19:20

Unsuitable?

By Cathy Frontera

Ted Smith and YWO provide a wonderful opportunity for new writers to improve and accomplished writers to get noticed. As with any new idea, and only in its third year, the sight is still growing and adjusting. Founded on an altruistic principle of writers helping other writers, it works on the whole, but as with any system there are always those who bend the rules to their own means. That being said, for the most part, YWO is a good site for a writer to develop, run by a wonderful staff, with Ted Smith on the top of the list. I wish Lexi Reveillan and Guy Saville, the best of luck in their publishing careers, as well as all the other participants on the website.

12 Feb 08 00:08

Unsuitable?

See Also