Blogs
Amazon's $300m download
04.02.08
The purchase by Amazon of Audible should pose quite a serious question for both publishers and booksellers who want to sell audio books as digital downloads. As an industry we ought to feel very uncomfortable that one retailer will have virtual monopoly.
But the industry, in the most part, would rather ignore the whole problem and just be glad that someone is dealing with the files so it doesn't have to.
Tackling digital downloads raises questions for publishers on delivery, storage and marketing, and the question (yet again) if they can go direct to customer and cut everyone else out.
Wholesalers are in a unenviable position of having to look like they are digital distribution experts because they distribute physical copies of titles (and need to look like they're keeping up) but actually have few booksellers willing to integrate downloads into their online offer, and I suspect even fewer publishers banging on the door with the content.
Booksellers haven't exactly been at the forefront of pushing the digital download market – and yes I still strongly believe that a physical book is best, but in significant niches, such as audio there is clearly a market.
The niche is hard to measure because of Audible's dominance and iTunes' near monopoly of distribution. Just to have these downloads mixed in with the rest of the book catalogue isn't a solution to selling these titles, like any good book sale they need to be targeted at the right customer at the right time, and with the somewhat generic sites out there in book e-commerce at the moment this just isn't happening.
Admittedly Amazon's ambitions to include (and wrap up) digital downloads in its standard checkout screen and the launch of Kindle smack slightly of its existing large market share forcing it to look outside of standard formats, however the lack of APIs for the industry just to sell these titles is soon likely to be a barrier to growth for everyone.
Publishers should take this opportunity to look at delivery mechanisms outside of Audible and question DRM's appropriateness to these titles. If the music industry can move from DRM which seems increasingly likely – why can't audio titles which face far less of a potential pirating issue.
With Amazon leading the way in integrating downloads through its checkout and iTunes using only Audible for audio titles, we urgently need some diversification, both in this specific case and in online bookselling in general.
Comments on this article
By clive Keeble
In my opinion, Amazon are a predator which the publishing industry mistakenly views through rose tinted glasses. Seven years ago Amazon were on the verge of failure ; their deus ex machina was to aggressively attack via Marketplace where they were sure of getting income via listing fee, 15% commission and a wedge out of the shipping. Bezos and his band of merry men will slowly, slowly advance to control markets - their latest manoeuvre is to acquire a large stake in Lovefilm. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/05/amazon_lovefilm/ I do not believe anybody has been able to quantify the exact percentage of Amazon's profit which comes from "third-party" seller income ; its generally reckoned to be over 30%. This "cash" income will give Amazon the power to destroy other market operators.05 Feb 08 07:51
See Also
Kieron Smith
- Twit or miss
- Hopping to a new tune
Recent Blogs
- Culture shock
- Poles apart
- Don't Tweet back in anger
- Review: the Elonex ebook
- An eyewitness for Dorling Kindersley
Most Active
- 'Hooked on books' or 'Bookalicious'?
- Dressed to sell
- Should you write on?
- Save Methvens
- E is for e-magination
Latest Comments
- It is a great filling of working with Google and milestones are always a good time for...
- Peter: You make a lot of sense to me. It's not just publishers ... everyone's wet dream is to...
- It reminds me of the delightful 'journey of a book' waterstones training video. it also...
- Hiya, It is if anything slightly clearer that the sony ebook, and the definition is slightly...
- My question would be is the resolution and the 'whiteness' of the display better than the Sony?
RSS
Subscriber Content