Blogs

Ben Johncock

Ben Johncock is an unpublished author, working on his first novel, Arthur. He combined freelance writing with a career in the music industry before taking (very) early retirement to work in undemanding, stress-free environments and concentrate on his fiction. His website is www.benjohncock.com.

Who’d be me?

Every author must endure one of two common irritants in their writing lives:  For the published, it's people asking where they get their ideas from; for the unpublished, it's people confessing their desire to write a novel too, if only they had the time.

The frequency of this terrible aside looks set to increase - a recent YouGov poll has found that almost 10% of Britons aspire to being an author, followed by sports personality and astronaut.  With the current population of the UK at 60 million, that's 6 million wannabe scribblers.  What if just 10% of those did produce a manuscript? That's 600,000 manuscripts heading towards agents and publishers.  What then? Piles would go from slush to mush; spilling out into the streets. The entire West End and certain parts of Fulham would have to be closed off.

There is a serious point to be made here:  The limited resources of publishers and agents are already stretched. A trend like this will only increase the pressure and mean that promising manuscripts from people serious about writing fiction, who have worked hard for years on their craft, will find it even harder to get noticed.

Bitterness towards agents and publishers from rejected authors would also balloon. It was bad enough at the London Book Fair's 'How to get published' masterclass this year, during the Q&A session. Simon Trewin handled them like a master, but it's a professional hazard.  I felt embarrassed to be there. We can't have a situation where talented professionals are terrified of bumping into unpublished authors. There should be openness and dialogue.  The disgruntled give us all a bad name.  

So what on earth is going on? Is it Richard and Judy? The JK effect? That Jordan is now writing novels? That Kerry Katona is now writing novels? I think it's something more malignant - this country's increasing obsession with achieving fame without talent.

The trade, to its credit, has responded to the increasing competition amongst the unpublished with initiatives such as Macmillan New Writing, Snowcasing and WriteWords.  Some might argue that with all the emerging technology for self-publishing and self-marketing at the unpublished author's disposal, now is a fantastic time to be writing your first novel.

But as the ineffable Clare Alexander said, issuing a book is not the same as publishing a book. Publishing is more than the sum of its parts - editing, marketing, sales - it's the mark, the gold standard, the gold medal. Self-published authors might cite famous precedents, but deep down they all want to be published by a publishing house. Not for the increased sales from big-budget marketing, but for the validation - to be able to say, I am published.

The reality of being an unpublished author in 2007 is this:  It's tough.  And getting increasingly tougher. An astronaut seems like a more viable, less risky career choice. You also get a nifty jumpsuit. In all this, one thing is certain:  We need publishers and agents now more than ever.

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By James

Do we need publishers and agents as much as we think? Is anyone really unpublished now? The internet means that almost anyone can put their writing online and it's available to millions of people worldwide. That's publishing of a sort. The music industry is seeing a change in product lifecycle. Previously you always got signed before you made it, now we are seeing people make it and then get signed. Ben makes a good point that publishing is far more, and it certainly is. Being picked from the pile and signed has a certain amount of luck involved - ask Jane: http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2129738,00.html Maybe now that the internet has made us all agents it's a little less about luck and a little more about talent?

11 Sep 07 08:35

Unsuitable?

By Ben Johncock

Thanks for that James, some very interesting points, especially regarding the change in product lifecycle regarding bands getting signed. The internet can certainly help you get noticed. However, I stand very firmly by Clare’s comment that issuing a book (in its many guises) is not the same as publishing a book. The internet is publishing of a sort, as you say, but then so is printing a Word document – where do you draw the line? In crude terms, I would say publishing divorced from authorship. That said, anything that changes things to be less about luck and more about talent is fine by me!

11 Sep 07 10:04

Unsuitable?

By Rullsenberg

The possibility of getting the written word out into the public domain has definitely increased. What agents and publishers do is give that possibility a structure. So whilst means of distribution have multiplied via the internet etc, finding quality is not necessarily easier and being alerted to quality benefits from the structure provided by more formal means of publication. You're right about the validation thing too btw. But I would add something to the mix on this question and that is the bookshop, especially small independent stores. Big shops/chains can take the works pushed by smaller publishers (and perhaps placed there by smaller agents) but the conglomorates are always going to have an easier time and access to such outlets. As the paucity of small independent stores continues to bite some of those smaller publishers have fewer niches to find first homes for their books...

12 Sep 07 17:10

Unsuitable?

By Lynn

What does being published have to do with validation? I'm not asking that to show off a false sense of superiority. Rather, it's a question I ask myself every time I sit down to write. It's that tug-of-war between artistic talent and market appeal. Why do I need one publishing house to tell me my work is awesome so they can push it onto the masses? Can't I get that same sense of satisfaction knowing that one person bought the self-published work I toted on my blog? And what about the monetary aspect of publishers and agents? Their goal is profit. Publishers, agents, and bookstores would be more willing to risk their cost/efforts on another JK (non-Potter) than a newbie with great talent but an unrecognizable name. Recognition trumphs talent because recognition equals profit. So I am not sure that "we need publishers and agents now more than ever," but that we have to take a fresh approach to getting new writing out there. Perhaps the next wave will be small self-publishers who make their own rules and expand in contrast to the mainstream. An excellent example of this would be Dark Horse Comics. I don't know, but I'm not convinced getting more hands in the literary pot will help at all.

18 Sep 07 18:00

Unsuitable?

By Nigel Killick

Do we need publishers? Well, that's a hard one? I run a non-profit group, comprising of British trained actors, writers, producers and documentary makers, who have combined their areas of expertise in order to provide a free internet audio book, anecdotal story and social history documentaries site. We are always looking for writers who are willing to put their work on the web as part of the Public domain project. Check us out at www.peopletalk.libsyn.com Nigel Killick Excutive Producer.

28 Oct 07 16:33

Unsuitable?

See Also