Blogs
SALLY FLOYER
Sally Floyer is about to retire as m.d. of Penguin's brands and licensing division (Ladybird, Warne and BBC Children's Books) after 40 years in publishing.
Mould-breakers
21.01.08
It's a new year and I'm in tidying-up mode. I love browsing through old files—as well as reliving former dramas, you realise how little some of the publishing world's issues change.
A real treasure trove is the rejection letters file. When I took over at Kestrel in 1984, I found a letter from the late, great Patrick Hardy rejecting Richard Adams' Watership Down. The rejects file at Warne and Ladybird is more prosaic—mainly offerings of little stories about fairies or bunnies which the writers' grandchildren are always said to love. There is one notable exception, however: at the turn of the last century, Warne turned down a short story about a rabbit from one Beatrix Potter. They were smart enough to change their minds once she had proved them wrong by publishing The Tale of Peter Rabbit. Sadly, Patrick Hardy didn't get a second chance at Watership Down.
Getting something different published remains a huge challenge. J K Rowling was infamously rejected by a dozen publishers before Barry Cunningham “discovered” Harry Potter. Eric Hill, creator of Spot, has just been awarded an OBE for his work for literacy, and there is hardly anyone under 30 who wasn't brought up on his début, Where's Spot? But back in the late 1970s it took a small packager to see the possibility of a novelty book for toddlers—every trade publisher said it would cost too much and would never work.
I don't know how easy it was for Jacqueline Wilson to get her first book published. She has certainly earned her Damehood—not just because of her own books but for her tireless work for the cause of reading, most recently as Children's Laureate. She and Eric have in common an originality and humour that make their books immediately accessible to the most inexperienced reader without dumbing down; at their different levels, both have tackled the real concerns of a child's world in a new way.
The industry's innate caution hasn't changed in over 100 years, and this extends to jumping on bandwagons—just look at the shelves groaning with retro books following the success of The Dangerous Book for Boys.
Isn't the lesson here that we need to take more risks as a trade—be willing to break the mould and not cling to the safety of what has worked before? Even when publishers believe in an original book, retailers are often cautious—and when times get harder, everyone gets more cautious still. A New Year resolution to be braver might help our industry challenge a tough market in 2008.
Comments on this article
By Lyn LeJeune
Publishing is 90% all about how much money can be made; understandable, I suppose; how else to stay in business. But this is clouding literary judgement, as agents and publishers often don't seem to be able to see a great book when it stares them in the face. And it doesn't help that "kids" working on their BA in literature are the gatekeepers, or that publishing has also become a sort of dynastic inbreeding thing and agent and publishers become writers and of course get their books published no matter what. http://www.beatitudesinneworleans.blogspot.com "on Ignatius J. Reilly, Kelly Girls, Expanding Human Valves, and Ghosts" and The New Orleans Trilogy21 Jan 08 15:23
By Susan Humphreys
Ah but then there is a good side to great authors' rejections - it gives us as yet unpublished ones hope that one day we'll be added to the list Susan Humphreys www.drmidas.co.uk14 Feb 08 14:18
By Jan Field
This website has opened my eyes, Rejection is a horrible feeling, especially when it happens to yourself, all the effort, time, and determination for nothing. But we are all individual, unique, and should have minds of our own. The Authors certainly do.29 Feb 08 07:21
By Lexi Dick
Yes, and writers need to take more risks too. I was recently taken to task because I wrote my Y.A. fantasy books without ‘studying the market’, i.e. reading all the books currently available in that genre. This is thought to be A Good Thing To Do if you are an unpublished writer. The idea, I guess, is to fit in with agent/publisher expectations. Also, they say, to avoid writing something that has already been written – as if this was at all likely. I believe the best, groundbreaking novelists write what they must, without regard to what is popular.29 Feb 08 12:41
See Also
SALLY FLOYER
- Where the needs are
- Natural progress
- Licence to thrill
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- A token gesture
- Making publishing pay
- Making writing pay
- Death of the publisher?
Latest Comments
- Isn't the fact that JW apparently didn't realise the meaning of the word relevant here - would...
- When I went to Italy in July I brought over 100 books with me on my 12 months old Sony Reader -...
- I'm also a Sony Reader owner. I love it but my big problem is that I have a backlog of about 2...
- i think also now it may be abt the death of certain kinds of writers, too. thinking of an old...
- I think there is a generational barrier somewhere there. People like the way books feel, smell...
RSS
Subscriber Content